Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Charlton Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Charlton Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Dudley-Charlton Reg (06580000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Charlton Middle School (06580310)

Grades served:

05,06,07,08

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.3	93.7	92.7	-1.0	96.7	97.2	62	728	25	No Change
High needs		85.1	83.4	81.5	-1.9	91.3	92.6	57	176	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.4	87.4	86.1	-1.3	88.5	93.7	64	108	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		76.5	74.2	71.3	-2.9	86.3	88.3	54	89	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		84.6	87.8	86.5	-1.3	89.7	92.3	71	37	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		94.5	94.0	92.9	-1.1	96.8	97.3	55	661	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.8	81.9	81.4	-0.5	91.1	92.4	58	726	25	No Change
High needs		73.6	65.4	61.5	-3.9	84.6	86.8	41	176	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.4	70.4	65.7	-4.7	72.9	85.2	41	108	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		62.2	55.6	52.0	-3.6	78.0	81.1	55	89	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		78.8	67.3	68.2	0.9	85.9	89.4	58	37	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		85.2	82.7	82.2	-0.5	91.4	92.6	52	659	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.8	84.4	81.9	-2.5	90.0	91.4	76	353	25	No Change
High needs		67.2	77.9	66.6	-11.3	80.9	83.6	77	83	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.6	81.6	69.7	-11.9	83.1	90.8	78	52	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		59.1	69.1	60.6	-8.5	76.1	79.6	79	40	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		83.3	84.3	82.5	-1.8	90.3	91.7	71	323	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	20.3	15.7	728	0	1.9	2.2	728	0
High needs	8.9	2.3	176	0	7.3	8.5	176	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	13.0	2.8	108	0	2.6	5.6	108	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.1	2.2	89	0	14.4	16.9	89	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	14.6	8.1	37	0	2.4	5.4	37	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	20.0	16.0	661	0	2.0	2.1	661	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	24.1	24.4	726	0	9.9	10.2	726	0
High needs	9.4	5.7	176	0	26.6	30.1	176	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.4	8.3	108	0	17.4	25.0	108	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Students w/ disabilities	6.1	2.2	89	0	41.8	43.8	89	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	21.4	13.5	37	0	26.2	24.3	37	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	24.4	24.7	659	0	8.9	9.4	659	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	13.5	11.0	353	0	3.9	7.1	353	0
High needs	5.3	3.6	83	0	7.4	19.3	83	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.6	5.8	52	0	4.9	15.4	52	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.1	0.0	40	0	14.9	27.5	40	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	12.9	11.5	323	0	3.9	6.5	323	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		51.0	47.5	-3.5	51.0	No	702	50	Below Target
High needs		42.5	40.0	-2.5	51.0	No	162	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		48.0	37.0	-11.0	51.0	No	103	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		32.0	40.0	8.0	51.0	No	76	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		40.0	53.0	13.0	51.0	No	35	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		51.0	47.0	-4.0	51.0	No	637	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		38.0	41.0	3.0	51.0	No	701	50	Below Target
High needs		38.0	40.0	2.0	51.0	No	164	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		38.0	39.5	1.5	51.0	No	104	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		31.0	40.0	9.0	51.0	No	77	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		37.0	48.5	11.5	51.0	No	36	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		38.0	40.0	2.0	51.0	No	635	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	736	736	100	Yes	737	735	100	Yes	359	358	100	Yes
High needs	179	179	100	Yes	180	180	100	Yes	85	85	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	111	111	100	Yes	112	112	100	Yes	54	54	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	90	90	100	Yes	90	90	100	Yes	40	40	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	39	39	100	Yes	39	39	100	Yes	16	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	667	667	100	Yes	668	666	100	Yes	328	327	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.