Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dighton Middle School

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Dighton Middle School

Organization Information
District:Dighton-Rehoboth (06500000)School type:Middle School
School:Dighton Middle School (06500305)Grades served:05,06,07,08
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.2, Target = 95 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91.2, Target = 95 75 or Higher All Students 91.4 88.0 91.2 3.2 95.0 95.7 5537950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82.2, Target = 85.7 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 82.2, Target = 85.7 75 or Higher High needs 75.5 75.6 82.2 6.6 85.7 87.8 619750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.5, Target = 84.9 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 85.5, Target = 84.975 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 83.5 83.5 85.5 2.0 84.9 91.8 606275On Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.8, Target = 78.4 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 68.8, Target = 78.4 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 62.9 58.5 68.8 10.3 78.4 81.5 494450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.2, Target = 95 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.2, Target = 95 75 or Higher White 91.5 88.2 91.2 3.0 95.0 95.8 4435150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.1, Target = 88.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 78.1, Target = 88.7 75 or Higher All Students 80.6 75.2 78.1 2.9 88.7 90.3 4737750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.2, Target = 76.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 62.2, Target = 76.6 75 or Higher High needs 59.9 57.2 62.2 5.0 76.6 80.0 459650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 63.5, Target = 66.5 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 63.5, Target = 66.5 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 63.4 63.4 63.5 0.1 66.5 81.7 326150Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 56.3, Target = 69.6 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 56.3, Target = 69.6 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 47.8 47.2 56.3 9.1 69.6 73.9 694450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.5, Target = 88.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 78.5, Target = 88.8 75 or Higher White 80.8 75.8 78.5 2.7 88.8 90.4 3734950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.6, Target = 88.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 77.6, Target = 88.6 75 or Higher All Students 80.4 75.0 77.6 2.6 88.6 90.2 5918150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 64.2, Target = 76 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 64.2, Target = 76 75 or Higher High needs 58.9 60.5 64.2 3.7 76.0 79.5 675150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70.7, Target = 68.8 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 70.7, Target = 68.8CPI = 70.7, Target = 68.875 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 66.0 66.0 70.7 4.7 68.8 83.0 8235100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities  48.0---- 74.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.5, Target = 88.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 77.5, Target = 88.9 75 or Higher White 81.0 76.0 77.5 1.5 88.9 90.5 4516750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 6.2 6.13790 5.1 3.437925
High needs 1.1 1.0970 15.6 9.39725
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.8 1.6620 8.9 6.56225
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0440 31.8 20.54425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.8 5.43510 5.0 3.435125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 14.4 18.337725 15.0 12.737725
High needs 5.6 9.49625 33.3 27.19625
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.1 9.86125 23.2 24.6610
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 2.3 6.84425 50.0 36.44425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.0 18.334925 13.7 11.734925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 1.9 4.418125 8.7 7.218125
High needs 0.0 2.05125 20.9 21.6510
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 2.93525 12.0 8.63525
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 1.3 3.616725 6.6 7.21670
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 50, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 42.0 50.0 8.0 51.0Yes37375On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 49, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 40.5 49.0 8.5 51.0Yes9675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 51, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 51, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 45.5 51.0 5.5 51.0No6175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 45.5, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 29.0 45.5 16.5 51.0Yes44100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 42.0 49.5 7.5 51.0Yes34675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 51, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 39.0 51.0 12.0 51.0No37075On Target
High needsSGP = 48.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 48.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 41.0 48.5 7.5 51.0No9450Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 43, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 43, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 46.0 43.0 -3.0 51.0No5950Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 62, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 5175 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 41.0 62.0 21.0 51.0Yes43100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 51, Target = 5175 or Higher White 39.0 51.0 12.0 51.0No34375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students390390100Yes389388100Yes187187100Yes
High needs104104100Yes103103100Yes5656100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged6969100Yes6868100Yes4040100Yes
EL and Former EL2---2---1---
Students w/ disabilities4545100Yes4545100Yes2323100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---5---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---2---
Hispanic/Latino12---12---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White358358100Yes357356100Yes171171100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles