Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Edward J. O’Donoghue Middle School

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Bridgewater Middle School

Organization Information
District:Bridgewater-Raynham (06250000)School type:Middle School
School:Bridgewater Middle School (06250320)Grades served:07,08
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.7, Target = 97.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 94.7, Target = 97.3 75 or Higher All Students 95.4 94.4 94.7 0.3 97.3 97.7 7948250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82, Target = 93.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 82, Target = 93.2 75 or Higher High needs 88.4 82.9 82.0 -0.9 93.2 94.2 6012125No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.6, Target = 90.4 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 86.6, Target = 90.4 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 89.5 89.5 86.6 -2.9 90.4 94.8 68670Declined
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72, Target = 86.6 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 72, Target = 86.6 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 77.0 70.3 72.0 1.7 86.6 88.5 566750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.1, Target = 97.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 95.1, Target = 97.5 75 or Higher White 95.7 94.3 95.1 0.8 97.5 97.9 7444475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.1, Target = 90.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 86.1, Target = 90.8 75 or Higher All Students 84.3 83.3 86.1 2.8 90.8 92.2 7547950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 65.4, Target = 80.8 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 65.4, Target = 80.8 75 or Higher High needs 67.1 60.1 65.4 5.3 80.8 83.6 6112050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75, Target = 74.8 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 75, Target = 74.875 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 72.5 72.5 75.0 2.5 74.8 86.3 786675On Target
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 49.2, Target = 70.3 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 49.2, Target = 70.3 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 49.0 42.3 49.2 6.9 70.3 74.5 486650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.1, Target = 91.1 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 87.1, Target = 91.1 75 or Higher White 84.8 83.6 87.1 3.5 91.1 92.4 7444150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.2, Target = 89.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 78.2, Target = 89.8 75 or Higher All Students 82.5 80.7 78.2 -2.5 89.8 91.3 6223325No Change
High needsCPI = 60.2, Target = 83.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 60.2, Target = 83.2 75 or Higher High needs 71.2 64.1 60.2 -3.9 83.2 85.6 47590Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 64.8, Target = 74.5 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 64.8, Target = 74.5 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 72.2 72.2 64.8 -7.4 74.5 86.1 60320Declined
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 52.1, Target = 77.9 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 52.1, Target = 77.9 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 62.1 51.7 52.1 0.4 77.9 81.1 533550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.5, Target = 90.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 78.5, Target = 90.3 75 or Higher White 83.3 81.0 78.5 -2.5 90.3 91.7 5222025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 19.8 26.348225 3.5 2.548225
High needs 7.3 5.81210 13.0 9.112125
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.6 10.4670 8.7 10.4670
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 3.1 0.0670 23.4 14.96725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.5 27.044425 3.6 2.044425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 28.7 38.647925 10.2 10.24790
High needs 8.7 10.812025 34.9 33.31200
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.1 18.26625 22.5 22.7660
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 3.1 1.5660 56.9 51.5660
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.3 40.144125 10.0 9.14410
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 2.1 3.923325 5.9 9.42330
High needs 0.0 0.0590 21.0 28.8590
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0320 16.7 25.0320
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0350 36.7 40.0350
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 1.6 4.122025 6.3 9.52200
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 56.0 61.0 5.0 51.0No471100Above Target
High needsSGP = 51.5, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 51.5, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 57.0 51.5 -5.5 51.0No11475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 46, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 55.0 46.0 -9.0 51.0No6350Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 52, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-SGP = 52, Target = 5175 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 57.0 52.0 -5.0 51.0No6275On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-16--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 5175 or Higher White 56.0 60.0 4.0 51.0No436100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 69, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 56.0 69.0 13.0 51.0Yes467100Above Target
High needsSGP = 62, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 50.0 62.0 12.0 51.0Yes112100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 66, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 53.0 66.0 13.0 51.0Yes63100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 54, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 48.0 54.0 6.0 51.0Yes5975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-16--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 70, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 5175 or Higher White 56.0 70.0 14.0 51.0Yes431100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02.00-
High needs- 60.02.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.02.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students49749499Yes49749199Yes24324199Yes
High needs13012898Yes13012798Yes656498Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged7171100Yes717099Yes353497Yes
EL and Former EL7---7---2---
Students w/ disabilities727097Yes726996Yes393897Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---3---
Afr. Amer./Black16---16---6---
Hispanic/Latino7---7---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White45945699Yes45945399Yes23022899Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles