Massachusetts School and District Profiles

A F Maloney

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - A F Maloney

Organization Information
District:Blackstone-Millville (06220000)School type:Elementary School
School:A F Maloney (06220015)Grades served:03,04,05
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.5, Target = 87.6CPI = 85.5, Target = 87.6CPI = 85.5, Target = 87.6 78.8 85.1 85.5 0.4 87.6 89.4 4926950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.3, Target = 79.8CPI = 73.3, Target = 79.8CPI = 73.3, Target = 79.8 65.4 75.0 73.3 -1.7 79.8 82.7 3810425No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.9, Target = 81.3CPI = 85.9, Target = 81.3CPI = 85.9, Target = 81.3 79.6 79.6 85.9 6.3 81.3 89.8 8862100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 54.8, Target = 69.1CPI = 54.8, Target = 69.1CPI = 54.8, Target = 69.1 47.0 56.0 54.8 -1.2 69.1 73.5 254725No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.8, Target = 88.5CPI = 85.8, Target = 88.5CPI = 85.8, Target = 88.5 80.3 85.3 85.8 0.5 88.5 90.2 3724150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.5, Target = 87.5CPI = 82.5, Target = 87.5CPI = 82.5, Target = 87.5 78.5 77.4 82.5 5.1 87.5 89.3 3626850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.3, Target = 76.8CPI = 73.3, Target = 76.8CPI = 73.3, Target = 76.8 60.2 68.2 73.3 5.1 76.8 80.1 3910450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.2, Target = 75.3CPI = 80.2, Target = 75.3CPI = 80.2, Target = 75.3 73.1 73.1 80.2 7.1 75.3 86.6 6762100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.8, Target = 66.8CPI = 62.8, Target = 66.8CPI = 62.8, Target = 66.8 43.0 52.0 62.8 10.8 66.8 71.5 454750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.9, Target = 88.1CPI = 82.9, Target = 88.1CPI = 82.9, Target = 88.1 79.6 78.1 82.9 4.8 88.1 89.8 2424050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79, Target = 86.9CPI = 79, Target = 86.9CPI = 79, Target = 86.9 77.6 79.5 79.0 -0.5 86.9 88.8 449425No Change
High needsCPI = 68.9, Target = 77.1CPI = 68.9, Target = 77.1CPI = 68.9, Target = 77.1 60.7 73.6 68.9 -4.7 77.1 80.4 53370Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.3, Target = 79.6CPI = 71.3, Target = 79.6CPI = 71.3, Target = 79.6 77.7 77.7 71.3 -6.4 79.6 88.9 67270Declined
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.7, Target = 87.3CPI = 80.7, Target = 87.3CPI = 80.7, Target = 87.3 78.2 79.7 80.7 1.0 87.3 89.1 308450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 12.1 14.526925 5.5 7.82690
High needs 7.1 4.81040 12.9 18.31040
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.3 6.5620 7.4 6.56225
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0470 32.0 36.2470
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.9 15.424125 5.1 7.92410
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 15.5 28.426825 6.5 9.02680
High needs 7.1 10.610425 12.9 16.31040
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.3 14.56225 9.3 9.7620
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 6.44725 24.0 27.7470
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.9 30.424025 6.2 9.22400
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 10.5 6.4940 3.8 7.4940
High needs 5.4 2.7370 8.1 16.2370
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.1 3.7270 7.1 14.8270
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.5 6.0840 3.2 7.1840
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 50.0 36.0 -14.0 51.0Yes17975On Target
High needsSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 42.0 29.0 -13.0 51.0No690Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 35.5, Target = 51SGP = 35.5, Target = 51SGP = 35.5, Target = 51 42.0 35.5 -6.5 51.0Yes4275On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-31--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 51.0 36.0 -15.0 51.0Yes15975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 46.0 34.5 -11.5 51.0Yes17875On Target
High needsSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 39.0 31.0 -8.0 51.0Yes6975On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 37.0 29.0 -8.0 51.0Yes4275On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-31--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51 46.5 31.5 -15.0 51.0Yes15875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.010-
High needs- 60.010-
EL and Former EL- 60.010-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students278277100Yes27827699Yes989698Yes
High needs10910899Yes10910899Yes403998Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged6565100Yes6565100Yes2929100Yes
EL and Former EL10---10---3---
Students w/ disabilities494898Yes494898Yes13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---2---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White247246100Yes24724599Yes888698Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles