Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Ayer Shirley Regional Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Ayer Shirley Regional Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Ayer Shirley School District (06160000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Ayer Shirley Regional Middle School (06160305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.7	86.5	86.7	0.2	92.8	93.9	33	362	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		78.1	74.6	74.5	-0.1	87.2	89.1	23	148	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.2	77.2	79.0	1.8	79.1	88.6	28	100	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		67.6	66.0	57.7	-8.3	81.1	83.8	19	75	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		83.8	83.3	87.1	3.8	90.6	91.9	73	29	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		87.5	-	-	-	-	93.8	-	25	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		89.0	87.3	87.2	-0.1	93.6	94.5	24	274	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		70.5	76.5	76.5	0.0	82.8	85.3	40	362	25	No Change
High needs		55.4	60.2	59.5	-0.7	74.0	77.7	30	148	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.5	61.5	64.0	2.5	64.7	80.8	34	100	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		42.4	51.8	42.8	-9.0	66.4	71.2	24	76	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		56.3	64.4	66.7	2.3	74.5	78.2	55	30	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		73.8	-	-	-	-	86.9	-	25	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		72.3	78.1	78.3	0.2	83.8	86.2	34	273	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		70.8	78.4	77.0	-1.4	83.0	85.4	56	124	25	No Change
High needs		59.1	65.6	67.9	2.3	76.1	79.6	80	53	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.5	72.5	68.3	-4.2	74.8	86.3	74	41	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		50.0	59.9	54.5	-5.4	70.8	75.0	61	22	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		70.5	78.5	78.2	-0.3	82.8	85.3	49	93	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.9	12.7	362	0	9.3	9.7	362	0
High needs	3.5	4.1	148	25	21.4	22.3	148	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.9	4.0	100	0	18.4	19.0	100	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.0	2.7	75	25	31.1	38.7	75	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	3.4	29	25	12.1	6.9	29	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	25	-	-	-	25	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	13.4	14.2	274	0	9.5	9.5	274	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	26.0	22.7	362	0	17.0	16.3	362	0
High needs	6.5	8.1	148	25	32.5	33.8	148	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.9	10.0	100	25	30.4	29.0	100	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Students w/ disabilities	4.0	2.6	76	0	44.4	55.3	76	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	24.2	13.3	30	0	24.2	23.3	30	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	25	-	-	-	25	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	25.4	25.3	273	0	15.7	15.4	273	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.4	6.5	124	25	9.2	6.5	124	25
High needs	0.0	7.5	53	25	18.0	15.1	53	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	7.3	41	25	6.7	17.1	41	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	4.5	22	25	26.3	31.8	22	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1.8	8.6	93	25	9.6	6.5	93	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		42.0	48.0	6.0	51.0	No	354	50	Below Target
High needs		35.0	46.0	11.0	51.0	No	143	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		34.5	49.0	14.5	51.0	Yes	96	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		37.0	38.0	1.0	51.0	No	71	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		30.0	54.0	24.0	51.0	Yes	29	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		43.0	46.0	3.0	51.0	No	272	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		52.5	59.0	6.5	51.0	No	352	75	On Target
High needs		43.0	50.0	7.0	51.0	No	142	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		42.0	50.0	8.0	51.0	No	95	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		42.0	44.0	2.0	51.0	No	71	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		59.0	59.5	0.5	51.0	No	30	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		51.0	61.0	10.0	51.0	No	269	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	6.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	6.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	6.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	380	376	99	Yes	380	376	99	Yes	128	127	99	Yes
High needs	157	156	99	Yes	157	156	99	Yes	56	55	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	108	107	99	Yes	108	107	99	Yes	43	43	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	78	77	99	Yes	78	78	100	Yes	24	23	96	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	10	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	35	34	97	Yes	35	35	100	Yes	12	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	27	27	100	Yes	27	27	100	Yes	6	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	284	281	99	Yes	284	280	99	Yes	96	95	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.