Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Briggs Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Briggs Elementary
Organization Information
District:Ashburnham-Westminster (06100000)School type:Elementary School
School:Briggs Elementary (06100025)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.8, Target = 89.7CPI = 83.8, Target = 89.7CPI = 83.8, Target = 89.7 82.4 83.5 83.8 0.3 89.7 91.2 4124950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.2, Target = 80.7CPI = 73.2, Target = 80.7CPI = 73.2, Target = 80.7 66.9 70.6 73.2 2.6 80.7 83.5 379950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.4, Target = 80.4CPI = 81.4, Target = 80.4 78.6 78.6 81.4 2.8 80.4 89.3 724775On Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 66, Target = 73.1CPI = 66, Target = 73.1CPI = 66, Target = 73.1 53.9 62.7 66.0 3.3 73.1 77.0 556150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.8, Target = 90CPI = 83.8, Target = 90CPI = 83.8, Target = 90 82.8 84.0 83.8 -0.2 90.0 91.4 2723525No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88, Target = 88.5CPI = 88, Target = 88.5 80.3 80.4 88.0 7.6 88.5 90.2 6224975On Target
High needsCPI = 76.8, Target = 80.9CPI = 76.8, Target = 80.9CPI = 76.8, Target = 80.9 67.3 66.4 76.8 10.4 80.9 83.7 549950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84, Target = 77.5CPI = 84, Target = 77.5CPI = 84, Target = 77.5 75.5 75.5 84.0 8.5 77.5 87.8 8147100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.9, Target = 74.2CPI = 68.9, Target = 74.2CPI = 68.9, Target = 74.2 55.8 53.5 68.9 15.4 74.2 77.9 626150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88, Target = 88.9CPI = 88, Target = 88.9 80.9 81.4 88.0 6.6 88.9 90.5 5023575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.7, Target = 92.5CPI = 77.7, Target = 92.5CPI = 77.7, Target = 92.5 87.2 82.0 77.7 -4.3 92.5 93.6 39940Declined
High needsCPI = 66.4, Target = 86.6CPI = 66.4, Target = 86.6CPI = 66.4, Target = 86.6 77.0 72.0 66.4 -5.6 86.6 88.5 45380Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities  60.7---- 80.4-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.8, Target = 92.9CPI = 77.8, Target = 92.9CPI = 77.8, Target = 92.9 87.8 82.6 77.8 -4.8 92.9 93.9 23890Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.5 7.22490 5.9 5.62490
High needs 4.4 4.0990 13.2 14.1990
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.3 8.5470 10.4 6.44725
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0610 17.6 19.7610
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.9 7.72350 6.1 6.02350
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.4 33.724925 8.8 4.024925
High needs 12.2 19.29925 20.0 10.19925
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.7 25.54725 12.5 4.34725
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 8.0 8.2610 30.0 14.86125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.4 33.623525 7.0 3.823525
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.5 11.79425 7.0 7.4940
High needs 9.1 0.0380 18.2 18.4380
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.0 12.48925 7.3 6.7890
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 36.0 41.0 5.0 51.0No15250Below Target
High needsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 37.0 42.0 5.0 51.0No5650Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 30.0 47.0 17.0 51.0No28100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 44.0 38.5 -5.5 51.0No3425Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 36.0 41.0 5.0 51.0No14650Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 33.5 46.5 13.0 51.0Yes15275On Target
High needsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 33.0 45.5 12.5 51.0Yes5675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51 35.0 48.5 13.5 51.0Yes2875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 33.0 44.0 11.0 51.0Yes3475On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 34.0 45.0 11.0 51.0Yes14675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.07-
High needs- 60.07-
EL and Former EL- 60.07-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students25424998Yes25425299Yes9494100Yes
High needs999697Yes9999100Yes3838100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged474596Yes4747100Yes16---
EL and Former EL11---11---6---
Students w/ disabilities6161100Yes6161100Yes2424100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino6---6---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White24023899Yes24023899Yes8989100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles