Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Blanchard Memorial School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Blanchard Memorial School
Organization Information
District:Acton-Boxborough (06000000)School type:Elementary School
School:Blanchard Memorial School (06000005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.7, Target = 96CPI = 92.7, Target = 96CPI = 92.7, Target = 96 93.1 94.0 92.7 -1.3 96.0 96.6 8325775On Target
High needsCPI = 79.2, Target = 82.1CPI = 79.2, Target = 82.1CPI = 79.2, Target = 82.1 69.3 83.0 79.2 -3.8 82.1 84.7 67720Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75, Target = 79.4CPI = 75, Target = 79.4CPI = 75, Target = 79.4 64.7 76.1 75.0 -1.1 79.4 82.4 774925No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 95.4, Target = 98.3CPI = 95.4, Target = 98.3CPI = 95.4, Target = 98.3 97.1 97.2 95.4 -1.8 98.3 98.6 6487100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.1, Target = 95.6CPI = 93.1, Target = 95.6CPI = 93.1, Target = 95.6 92.4 92.6 93.1 0.5 95.6 96.2 8014475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.9, Target = 96.3CPI = 93.9, Target = 96.3CPI = 93.9, Target = 96.3 93.6 94.0 93.9 -0.1 96.3 96.8 8925775On Target
High needsCPI = 84, Target = 82.7CPI = 84, Target = 82.7CPI = 84, Target = 82.7 70.3 83.4 84.0 0.6 82.7 85.2 8272100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 80.1, Target = 79.4CPI = 80.1, Target = 79.4 64.7 78.4 80.1 1.7 79.4 82.4 894975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 95.7, Target = 99.1CPI = 95.7, Target = 99.1CPI = 95.7, Target = 99.1 98.4 95.7 95.7 0.0 99.1 99.2 4787100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95, Target = 95.8CPI = 95, Target = 95.8 92.8 93.8 95.0 1.2 95.8 96.4 91144100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.9, Target = 95.7CPI = 94.9, Target = 95.7 92.7 91.9 94.9 3.0 95.7 96.4 9764100Above Target
High needs -------21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  95.5---- 97.8-20--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.9, Target = 95.5CPI = 96.9, Target = 95.5CPI = 96.9, Target = 95.5 92.2 93.1 96.9 3.8 95.5 96.1 9840100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.5 27.22570 2.4 3.12570
High needs 11.1 6.9720 8.3 11.1720
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities 4.5 2.0490 13.6 14.3490
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 40.7 31.0870 1.2 3.4870
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.8 26.41440 2.6 1.414425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 53.3 54.52570 2.0 3.92570
High needs 25.7 25.0720 6.8 11.1720
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities 15.9 18.44925 11.4 14.3490
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 67.1 69.0870 1.2 3.4870
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 47.7 50.01440 2.0 2.81440
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 37.3 48.46425 6.8 1.66425
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--20---20-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 41.7 45.0400 5.6 0.04025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 54.0 55.0 1.0 51.0No18975On Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 45.5 50.0 4.5 51.0No5150Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 44.0 49.0 5.0 51.0No3450Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 58.0 60.0 2.0 51.0No62100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 46.0 53.0 7.0 51.0No10975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 76, Target = 51SGP = 76, Target = 51SGP = 76, Target = 51 58.0 76.0 18.0 51.0No193100Above Target
High needsSGP = 76.5, Target = 51SGP = 76.5, Target = 51SGP = 76.5, Target = 51 53.5 76.5 23.0 51.0No54100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-12--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 78, Target = 51SGP = 78, Target = 51SGP = 78, Target = 51 49.0 78.0 29.0 51.0No35100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 77.5, Target = 51SGP = 77.5, Target = 51SGP = 77.5, Target = 51 60.5 77.5 17.0 51.0Yes64100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 77, Target = 51SGP = 77, Target = 51SGP = 77, Target = 51 56.0 77.0 21.0 51.0Yes111100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.06-
High needs- 60.06-
EL and Former EL- 60.06-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students262262100Yes262262100Yes6565100Yes
High needs7777100Yes7777100Yes2222100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged19---19---6---
EL and Former EL19---19---8---
Students w/ disabilities5050100Yes5050100Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2-------
Asian8787100Yes8787100Yes2020100Yes
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---2---
Hispanic/Latino9---9---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White147147100Yes147147100Yes4141100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles