Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Veritas Preparatory Charter School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Veritas Preparatory Charter School

Organization Information

District:

Veritas Preparatory Charter School (District) (04980000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Veritas Preparatory Charter School (04980405)

Grades served:

05,06,07,08

Region:

Pioneer Valley

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Insufficient data

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		86.7	87.0	82.1	-4.9	90.0	93.4	20	292	0	Declined
High needs		85.4	85.1	78.3	-6.8	89.1	92.7	39	218	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		85.5	85.5	80.2	-5.3	86.7	92.8	32	199	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		72.3	77.8	67.3	-10.5	76.9	86.2	36	49	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		52.1	59.6	47.3	-12.3	60.1	76.1	5	47	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		91.9	90.6	89.9	-0.7	93.3	96.0	86	67	25	No Change
Hispanic/Latino		81.0	83.8	78.0	-5.8	85.8	90.5	37	193	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.3	81.9	78.2	-3.7	82.2	88.2	47	293	0	Declined
High needs		73.9	78.6	74.5	-4.1	80.4	87.0	90	219	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.8	79.8	76.1	-3.7	81.5	89.9	81	200	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		70.5	72.9	63.3	-9.6	75.4	85.3	64	49	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		42.4	46.9	43.1	-3.8	52.0	71.2	25	47	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		83.3	83.0	84.3	1.3	86.1	91.7	95	67	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		69.4	79.8	74.4	-5.4	77.1	84.7	76	194	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		83.4	73.2	75.2	2.0	87.6	91.7	51	141	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		81.3	69.7	70.6	0.9	86.0	90.7	89	103	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.5	70.5	69.6	-0.9	73.0	85.3	77	93	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	25	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		81.0	-	-	-	-	90.5	-	33	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		80.6	70.5	70.8	0.3	85.5	90.3	93	89	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.4	14.7	292	25	6.9	12.3	292	0
High needs	6.7	10.1	218	25	7.9	15.1	218	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.7	10.6	199	25	7.9	14.1	199	0
EL and Former EL	11.1	6.1	49	0	13.9	28.6	49	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	2.1	47	25	29.4	40.4	47	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	5.7	20.9	67	25	3.8	7.5	67	0
Hispanic/Latino	9.3	9.8	193	0	9.3	14.5	193	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	26.3	22.5	293	0	10.1	15.7	293	0
High needs	21.1	19.6	219	0	12.6	19.2	219	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	22.4	19.5	200	0	10.6	17.0	200	0
EL and Former EL	14.3	14.3	49	0	17.1	30.6	49	0
Students w/ disabilities	3.1	4.3	47	25	53.1	57.4	47	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	18.9	22.4	67	25	9.4	10.4	67	0
Hispanic/Latino	25.2	20.1	194	0	12.2	18.6	194	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.8	7.8	141	0	15.9	14.2	141	25
High needs	8.2	4.9	103	0	18.0	18.4	103	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	8.9	4.3	93	0	16.1	19.4	93	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	25	-	-	-	25	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	33	-	-	-	33	-
Hispanic/Latino	7.1	5.6	89	0	19.6	20.2	89	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		71.0	47.0	-24.0	51.0	No	249	50	Below Target
High needs		69.0	42.5	-26.5	51.0	No	182	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.0	46.0	-21.0	51.0	No	168	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		75.0	32.0	-43.0	51.0	No	37	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		62.0	18.0	-44.0	51.0	No	37	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		62.5	55.5	-7.0	51.0	No	58	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		72.0	42.0	-30.0	51.0	No	161	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.5	46.5	-28.0	51.0	No	248	50	Below Target
High needs		71.5	45.0	-26.5	51.0	No	181	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.0	43.0	-28.0	51.0	No	167	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		65.0	36.0	-29.0	51.0	No	35	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		49.5	34.5	-15.0	51.0	No	36	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		69.0	60.0	-9.0	51.0	Yes	58	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		78.0	40.0	-38.0	51.0	No	160	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	87.0	60.0	21.00	25
High needs	87.0	60.0	21.00	25
EL and Former EL	87.0	60.0	21.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	295	291	99	Yes	295	293	99	Yes	142	141	99	Yes
High needs	221	217	98	Yes	221	219	99	Yes	104	103	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	202	198	98	Yes	202	200	99	Yes	94	93	99	Yes
EL and Former EL	49	48	98	Yes	49	49	100	Yes	25	25	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	48	46	96	Yes	48	47	98	Yes	23	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	67	67	100	Yes	67	67	100	Yes	34	33	97	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	196	192	98	Yes	196	194	99	Yes	89	89	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-	12	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.