Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dorchester Collegiate Academy Charter

Districts
Schools

2016

This organization is currently closed.

2016 Accountability Data - Dorchester Collegiate Academy Charter

Organization Information

District:

Dorchester Collegiate Academy Charter (District) (04750000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

Dorchester Collegiate Academy Charter (04750505)

Grades served:

04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.3	75.2	67.5	-7.7	85.0	87.2	13	186	0	Declined
High needs		74.6	71.8	65.5	-6.3	85.2	87.3	16	150	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.0	74.0	65.5	-8.5	76.2	87.0	15	113	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		65.4	69.0	68.5	-0.5	74.1	82.7	45	85	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		49.0	57.0	50.9	-6.1	61.8	74.5	17	58	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		70.5	74.6	67.6	-7.0	82.8	85.3	24	136	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		65.2	72.9	67.9	-5.0	73.9	82.6	20	49	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		67.3	66.4	65.6	-0.8	80.9	83.7	22	189	25	No Change
High needs		67.6	62.1	62.7	0.6	81.1	83.8	33	153	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.4	60.4	62.4	2.0	63.7	80.2	30	115	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		62.5	68.1	67.3	-0.8	71.9	81.3	60	84	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		37.5	40.3	43.4	3.1	53.1	68.8	19	61	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		63.3	65.7	65.5	-0.2	78.6	81.7	45	137	25	No Change
Hispanic/Latino		54.3	63.8	66.7	2.9	65.7	77.2	40	51	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.8	48.6	40.0	-8.6	70.1	74.4	6	85	0	Declined
High needs		48.7	44.8	38.4	-6.4	70.1	74.4	4	69	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		45.1	45.1	39.2	-5.9	49.7	72.6	8	60	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		44.8	-	-	-	-	72.4	-	34	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	37	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		47.1	48.6	40.8	-7.8	69.1	73.6	12	68	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.2	2.7	186	25	15.3	23.1	186	0
High needs	0.8	2.0	150	25	18.5	25.3	150	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.0	2.7	113	25	16.3	24.8	113	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	1.2	85	25	18.5	21.2	85	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	58	0	31.3	37.9	58	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.9	3.7	136	25	15.4	22.8	136	0
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	49	0	19.4	22.4	49	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.7	6.9	189	0	23.3	23.8	189	0
High needs	6.2	6.5	153	0	27.7	25.5	153	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.8	7.8	115	25	29.1	25.2	115	25
EL and Former EL	7.4	7.1	84	0	22.2	21.4	84	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.6	61	25	55.6	50.8	61	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	6.5	6.6	137	0	25.2	25.5	137	0
Hispanic/Latino	10.5	7.8	51	0	21.1	17.6	51	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	0.0	85	0	38.0	52.9	85	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	69	0	47.2	58.0	69	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	60	0	46.3	56.7	60	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	34	-	-	-	34	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	37	-	-	-	37	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.0	0.0	68	0	36.5	51.5	68	0
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.0	38.0	-8.0	51.0	No	153	25	Below Target
High needs		42.0	38.0	-4.0	51.0	No	123	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		44.0	38.0	-6.0	51.0	No	94	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		43.0	49.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	73	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		38.0	39.5	1.5	51.0	No	44	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		47.5	38.0	-9.5	51.0	No	113	25	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		37.0	45.0	8.0	51.0	No	39	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		64.0	56.5	-7.5	51.0	No	164	75	On Target
High needs		58.0	55.5	-2.5	51.0	No	132	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		57.5	52.5	-5.0	51.0	No	100	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		63.0	60.0	-3.0	51.0	No	72	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		39.0	42.5	3.5	51.0	No	52	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		64.0	59.5	-4.5	51.0	No	118	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		62.0	40.0	-22.0	51.0	No	45	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	33.0	60.0	33.00	0
High needs	33.0	60.0	33.00	0
EL and Former EL	33.0	60.0	33.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	194	184	95	Yes	194	189	97	Yes	86	85	99	Yes
High needs	158	148	95	Yes	158	153	97	Yes	70	69	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	118	111	95	Yes	118	115	97	Yes	60	60	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	87	83	95	Yes	87	84	97	Yes	34	34	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	62	58	95	Yes	62	61	98	Yes	38	37	97	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	140	136	97	Yes	140	137	98	Yes	69	68	99	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	53	47	91	No	53	51	96	Yes	17	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.