Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Holyoke Community Charter School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Holyoke Community Charter School

Organization Information

District:

Holyoke Community Charter (District) (04530000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

Holyoke Community Charter School (04530005)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Pioneer Valley

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.6	75.1	79.6	4.5	86.4	88.3	39	444	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		74.4	71.0	76.2	5.2	85.1	87.2	53	338	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.3	72.3	77.6	5.3	74.6	86.2	57	304	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		59.4	58.9	59.3	0.4	76.3	79.7	24	54	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		47.5	51.0	58.3	7.3	69.4	73.8	39	90	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		76.2	74.3	78.7	4.4	86.1	88.1	55	397	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		78.3	80.4	84.8	4.4	87.3	89.2	28	28	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.7	70.9	67.6	-3.3	84.1	86.4	25	442	0	Declined
High needs		71.0	69.0	64.1	-4.9	83.1	85.5	37	336	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.1	70.1	65.9	-4.2	72.6	85.1	41	302	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		60.4	66.0	54.2	-11.8	76.9	80.2	22	53	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		44.9	52.9	45.6	-7.3	67.9	72.5	26	90	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.8	70.2	67.3	-2.9	83.6	85.9	43	395	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		78.9	77.7	71.4	-6.3	87.7	89.5	11	28	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.8	63.2	64.8	1.6	76.6	79.9	47	160	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		58.6	60.6	61.2	0.6	75.9	79.3	59	112	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.6	61.6	62.4	0.8	64.8	80.8	70	101	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		44.0	-	-	-	-	72.0	-	32	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		57.7	61.9	63.8	1.9	75.3	78.9	79	140	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.7	2.5	444	0	13.2	10.4	444	25
High needs	1.5	3.0	338	25	16.7	13.0	338	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.6	3.3	304	25	15.1	12.2	304	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	54	0	29.2	35.2	54	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	90	0	42.9	30.0	90	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.3	2.5	397	0	14.3	11.3	397	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	8.1	3.6	28	0	5.4	3.6	28	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	7.2	5.9	442	0	14.7	18.8	442	0
High needs	5.4	4.2	336	0	14.9	21.7	336	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.9	4.6	302	0	13.8	20.5	302	0
EL and Former EL	2.1	0.0	53	0	10.6	20.8	53	0
Students w/ disabilities	1.3	2.2	90	25	37.7	44.4	90	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	5.2	5.3	395	0	15.1	18.7	395	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	24.3	10.7	28	0	13.5	17.9	28	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.5	4.4	160	25	19.8	20.0	160	0
High needs	3.3	3.6	112	0	21.1	24.1	112	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.8	4.0	101	0	18.8	21.8	101	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	32	-	-	-	32	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.9	2.9	140	0	21.9	20.7	140	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		38.0	46.5	8.5	51.0	Yes	338	75	On Target
High needs		35.0	47.0	12.0	51.0	Yes	254	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		35.5	44.5	9.0	51.0	Yes	230	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		35.0	50.0	15.0	51.0	No	37	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		27.0	47.0	20.0	51.0	Yes	57	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		39.0	47.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	297	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		30.0	44.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	25	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.0	33.0	-14.0	51.0	No	328	25	Below Target
High needs		47.5	31.0	-16.5	51.0	No	245	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		47.0	34.0	-13.0	51.0	No	222	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		41.5	30.0	-11.5	51.0	No	34	0	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		51.0	30.0	-21.0	51.0	No	56	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		45.0	33.0	-12.0	51.0	No	287	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		66.0	37.0	-29.0	51.0	No	25	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	60.0	60.0	63.00	25
High needs	60.0	60.0	63.00	25
EL and Former EL	60.0	60.0	63.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	444	444	100	Yes	443	442	100	Yes	160	160	100	Yes
High needs	338	338	100	Yes	337	336	100	Yes	112	112	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	304	304	100	Yes	303	302	100	Yes	101	101	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	54	54	100	Yes	54	53	98	Yes	18	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	90	90	100	Yes	90	90	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	397	397	100	Yes	396	395	100	Yes	140	140	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	28	28	100	Yes	28	28	100	Yes	15	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.