Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Benjamin Franklin Classical Charter Public School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Benjamin Franklin Classical Charter Public School
Organization Information
District:Benjamin Franklin Classical Charter Public (District) (04470000)School type:Elementary-Middle School
School:Benjamin Franklin Classical Charter Public School (04470205)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.2, Target = 98.8CPI = 95.2, Target = 98.8CPI = 95.2, Target = 98.8 97.9 94.9 95.2 0.3 98.8 99.0 92295100Above Target
High needsCPI = 84.8, Target = 95.3CPI = 84.8, Target = 95.3CPI = 84.8, Target = 95.3 91.9 80.1 84.8 4.7 95.3 96.0 856150Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.7, Target = 94.8CPI = 75.7, Target = 94.8CPI = 75.7, Target = 94.8 91.0 75.0 75.7 0.7 94.8 95.5 833550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 98.8, Target = 99.5CPI = 98.8, Target = 99.5 99.2 99.2 98.8 -0.4 99.5 99.6 8863100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.8, Target = 98.8CPI = 93.8, Target = 98.8CPI = 93.8, Target = 98.8 97.9 94.2 93.8 -0.4 98.8 99.0 7621175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.2, Target = 97.2CPI = 90.2, Target = 97.2CPI = 90.2, Target = 97.2 95.2 90.6 90.2 -0.4 97.2 97.6 8529575On Target
High needsCPI = 70.9, Target = 93.6CPI = 70.9, Target = 93.6CPI = 70.9, Target = 93.6 89.1 74.4 70.9 -3.5 93.6 94.6 62610Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.1, Target = 92.7CPI = 62.1, Target = 92.7CPI = 62.1, Target = 92.7 87.5 68.8 62.1 -6.7 92.7 93.8 73350Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 97.6, Target = 97.8CPI = 97.6, Target = 97.8 96.2 98.5 97.6 -0.9 97.8 98.1 8563100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.7, Target = 97CPI = 87.7, Target = 97CPI = 87.7, Target = 97 94.9 88.6 87.7 -0.9 97.0 97.5 6721175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.8, Target = 94.6CPI = 78.8, Target = 94.6CPI = 78.8, Target = 94.6 90.8 90.3 78.8 -11.5 94.6 95.4 72990Declined
High needs -------21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.8, Target = 94.5CPI = 77.8, Target = 94.5CPI = 77.8, Target = 94.5 90.5 90.1 77.8 -12.3 94.5 95.3 58720Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.3 25.12950 1.0 1.72950
High needs 7.7 8.2610 5.1 8.2610
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 3.6 2.9350 7.1 14.3350
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 43.1 36.5630 0.0 0.06325
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.8 22.72110 0.9 2.42110
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 40.5 45.429525 4.3 6.12950
High needs 15.4 13.1610 20.5 24.6610
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 7.1 5.7350 25.0 34.3350
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 73.8 71.4630 0.0 0.06325
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.4 38.921125 5.2 8.52110
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.0 12.1990 1.0 7.1990
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--16---16-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.2 11.17225 0.0 8.3720
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 55.5 51.0 -4.5 51.0No23775On Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 48.5 50.0 1.5 51.0Yes4775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
AsianSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 70.5 54.5 -16.0 51.0No4875On Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 50.0 49.5 -0.5 51.0No16850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 36.0 47.0 11.0 51.0No23575On Target
High needs --- 51.0-45--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
AsianSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 51.5 53.0 1.5 51.0No4975On Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 29.0 43.0 14.0 51.0No16575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students295295100Yes295295100Yes9999100Yes
High needs6161100Yes6161100Yes21---
Econ. Disadvantaged24---24---10---
EL and Former EL6---6---1---
Students w/ disabilities3535100Yes3535100Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian6363100Yes6363100Yes16---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino7---7---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White211211100Yes211211100Yes7272100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles