Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Benjamin Banneker Charter Public School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Benjamin Banneker Charter Public School
Organization Information
District:Benjamin Banneker Charter Public (District) (04200000)School type:Elementary School
School:Benjamin Banneker Charter Public School (04200205)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.3, Target = 85.8CPI = 90.3, Target = 85.8CPI = 90.3, Target = 85.8 75.6 90.9 90.3 -0.6 85.8 87.8 71183100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87.6, Target = 84.7CPI = 87.6, Target = 84.7CPI = 87.6, Target = 84.7 73.8 88.1 87.6 -0.5 84.7 86.9 94115100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 89.8, Target = 90CPI = 89.8, Target = 90 89.1 89.1 89.8 0.7 90.0 94.6 9610575On Target
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilities  40.6---- 70.3-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 90.2, Target = 86.1CPI = 90.2, Target = 86.1CPI = 90.2, Target = 86.1 76.2 90.7 90.2 -0.5 86.1 88.1 96145100Above Target
Hispanic/Latino -------24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------5--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87, Target = 84.1CPI = 87, Target = 84.1CPI = 87, Target = 84.1 72.7 85.8 87.0 1.2 84.1 86.4 56183100Above Target
High needsCPI = 83.3, Target = 83.3CPI = 83.3, Target = 83.3 71.3 82.3 83.3 1.0 83.3 85.7 8111575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.3, Target = 85.4CPI = 84.3, Target = 85.4CPI = 84.3, Target = 85.4 84.1 84.1 84.3 0.2 85.4 92.1 8210575On Target
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilities  38.5---- 69.3-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 86.2, Target = 84.1CPI = 86.2, Target = 84.1CPI = 86.2, Target = 84.1 72.7 85.6 86.2 0.6 84.1 86.4 94145100Above Target
Hispanic/Latino -------24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------5--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.8, Target = 73.3CPI = 87.8, Target = 73.3CPI = 87.8, Target = 73.3 54.3 85.6 87.8 2.2 73.3 77.2 7437100Above Target
High needsCPI = 85.9, Target = 70CPI = 85.9, Target = 70CPI = 85.9, Target = 70 48.5 80.0 85.9 5.9 70.0 74.3 9623100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 86.5, Target = 73.1CPI = 86.5, Target = 73.1CPI = 86.5, Target = 73.1 53.8 84.1 86.5 2.4 73.1 76.9 9624100Above Target
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.8 27.918325 2.9 6.01830
High needs 13.8 22.611525 4.6 7.81150
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.6 22.910525 3.1 6.71050
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities--25---25-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black 17.9 24.814525 3.0 6.91450
Hispanic/Latino--24---24-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--5---5-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 35.3 38.31830 5.8 7.11830
High needs 29.4 33.011525 8.3 10.41150
Econ. Disadvantaged 30.2 34.310525 7.3 9.51050
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities--25---25-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black 37.3 37.21450 6.0 7.61450
Hispanic/Latino--24---24-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--5---5-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.5 24.33725 7.5 0.03725
High needs 12.0 30.42325 12.0 0.02325
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--3---3-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black 15.2 25.02425 9.1 0.02425
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51 72.0 59.5 -12.5 51.0Yes12075On Target
High needsSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 74.0 53.5 -20.5 51.0Yes7875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 75.0 51.5 -23.5 51.0Yes7275On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 73.0 54.5 -18.5 51.0Yes9275On Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-3--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 66.0 44.0 -22.0 51.0Yes12075On Target
High needsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 65.0 42.0 -23.0 51.0No7850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 68.0 41.0 -27.0 51.0No7250Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 66.5 41.0 -25.5 51.0No9250Below Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-3--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.013-
High needs- 60.013-
EL and Former EL- 60.013-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students186186100Yes186186100Yes3838100Yes
High needs118118100Yes118118100Yes2424100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged107107100Yes107107100Yes23---
EL and Former EL18---18---4---
Students w/ disabilities2525100Yes2525100Yes3---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2---1---
Asian5---5---1---
Afr. Amer./Black147147100Yes147147100Yes2525100Yes
Hispanic/Latino24---24---9---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White5---5-------

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles