Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Worcester Arts Magnet School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Worcester Arts Magnet School

Organization Information

District:

Worcester (03480000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Worcester Arts Magnet School (03480225)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.2	95.7	96.5	0.8	95.5	96.1	99	193	100	Above Target
High needs		88.3	93.5	93.5	0.0	93.2	94.2	99	81	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		91.7	91.7	93.8	2.1	92.4	95.9	99	52	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		86.5	94.9	94.9	0.0	92.1	93.3	98	39	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		91.7	-	-	-	-	95.9	-	30	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		90.0	94.2	91.2	-3.0	94.2	95.0	98	34	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		93.0	96.0	97.9	1.9	95.9	96.5	99	107	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		86.8	94.2	94.5	0.3	92.3	93.4	92	192	100	Above Target
High needs		78.3	88.8	91.6	2.8	87.3	89.2	97	80	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		89.9	89.9	91.8	1.9	90.7	95.0	97	52	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		73.1	92.6	91.7	-0.9	84.3	86.6	92	39	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		78.6	-	-	-	-	89.3	-	30	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		83.3	91.3	94.1	2.8	90.3	91.7	98	34	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		90.0	96.0	95.0	-1.0	94.2	95.0	91	106	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.6	87.5	78.7	-8.8	82.3	84.8	43	54	0	Declined
High needs		64.4	-	67.0	-14.7	79.2	82.2	47	22	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.0	-	-	-	-	91.0	-	35	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.8	27.5	193	25	0.0	1.0	193	0
High needs	12.9	22.2	81	25	0.0	2.5	81	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.3	17.3	52	25	0.0	1.9	52	0
EL and Former EL	14.7	20.5	39	25	0.0	0.0	39	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	30	-	-	-	30	-
Hispanic/Latino	14.0	32.4	34	25	0.0	2.9	34	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	27.7	29.0	107	0	0.0	0.0	107	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	45.1	54.7	192	25	1.6	1.6	192	0
High needs	34.1	43.8	80	25	3.5	2.5	80	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	24.6	34.6	52	25	3.5	1.9	52	25
EL and Former EL	50.0	51.3	39	0	0.0	2.6	39	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	30	-	-	-	30	-
Hispanic/Latino	30.2	38.2	34	25	0.0	2.9	34	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	51.5	57.5	106	25	1.0	0.9	106	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	23.8	16.7	54	0	4.8	11.1	54	0
High needs	10.0	9.1	22	0	6.7	18.2	22	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	35	-	-	-	35	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		56.0	44.0	-12.0	51.0	Yes	135	75	On Target
High needs		52.0	44.0	-8.0	51.0	Yes	56	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		56.0	52.0	-4.0	51.0	Yes	35	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		47.5	59.0	11.5	51.0	No	25	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		60.0	39.5	-20.5	51.0	No	24	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		52.0	43.5	-8.5	51.0	Yes	78	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		52.5	38.5	-14.0	51.0	Yes	134	75	On Target
High needs		53.5	40.0	-13.5	51.0	Yes	55	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		59.5	45.0	-14.5	51.0	Yes	35	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		64.0	35.0	-29.0	51.0	No	25	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		41.0	38.5	-2.5	51.0	Yes	24	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		57.5	38.0	-19.5	51.0	No	77	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	85.0	60.0	38.00	25
High needs	85.0	60.0	38.00	25
EL and Former EL	85.0	60.0	38.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	201	201	100	Yes	201	200	100	Yes	57	57	100	Yes
High needs	88	88	100	Yes	88	87	99	Yes	25	25	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	58	58	100	Yes	58	58	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	42	42	100	Yes	42	42	100	Yes	12	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	30	30	100	Yes	30	30	100	Yes	5	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	38	38	100	Yes	38	38	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	110	110	100	Yes	110	109	99	Yes	36	36	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.