Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Goodyear Elementary School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Goodyear Elementary School
Organization Information
District:Woburn (03470000)School type:Elementary School
School:Goodyear Elementary School (03470005)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.4, Target = 90.8CPI = 78.4, Target = 90.8CPI = 78.4, Target = 90.8 84.3 78.4 78.4 0.0 90.8 92.2 2314025No Change
High needsCPI = 69, Target = 87.1CPI = 69, Target = 87.1CPI = 69, Target = 87.1 77.8 69.2 69.0 -0.2 87.1 88.9 217525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 74.5, Target = 73.2CPI = 74.5, Target = 73.2CPI = 74.5, Target = 73.2 70.8 70.8 74.5 3.7 73.2 85.4 3853100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities  67.9---- 84.0-28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.3, Target = 92.2CPI = 78.3, Target = 92.2CPI = 78.3, Target = 92.2 86.6 80.8 78.3 -2.5 92.2 93.3 1010625No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.3, Target = 88.2CPI = 79.3, Target = 88.2CPI = 79.3, Target = 88.2 79.7 76.0 79.3 3.3 88.2 89.9 2514050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 68, Target = 84.9CPI = 68, Target = 84.9CPI = 68, Target = 84.9 74.1 64.2 68.0 3.8 84.9 87.1 217550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.6, Target = 68.5CPI = 73.6, Target = 68.5CPI = 73.6, Target = 68.5 65.6 65.6 73.6 8.0 68.5 82.8 3953100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities  64.3---- 82.2-28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.3, Target = 89.4CPI = 78.3, Target = 89.4CPI = 78.3, Target = 89.4 81.8 77.6 78.3 0.7 89.4 90.9 1110650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 71.2, Target = 88CPI = 71.2, Target = 88CPI = 71.2, Target = 88 79.5 74.2 71.2 -3.0 88.0 89.8 25390Declined
High needsCPI = 58.3, Target = 82.4CPI = 58.3, Target = 82.4CPI = 58.3, Target = 82.4 69.8 69.4 58.3 -11.1 82.4 84.9 25210Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 73.4, Target = 88CPI = 73.4, Target = 88CPI = 73.4, Target = 88 79.4 76.0 73.4 -2.6 88.0 89.7 14310Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.9 6.414025 11.8 10.71400
High needs 1.5 1.3750 23.1 18.77525
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.9 1.9530 18.9 13.25325
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--28---28-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 4.3 5.710625 10.3 11.31060
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.8 20.014025 16.4 12.114025
High needs 9.2 13.37525 29.2 22.77525
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.7 11.35325 26.4 15.15325
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--28---28-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.2 19.810625 15.5 12.310625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.2 10.33925 11.3 23.1390
High needs 0.0 0.0210 14.8 38.1210
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 2.0 9.73125 8.2 19.4310
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 39.0 54.0 15.0 51.0No92100Above Target
High needsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 40.0 45.5 5.5 51.0No4850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 41.5 50.5 9.0 51.0Yes3875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 37.0 51.5 14.5 51.0No68100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 54.0 58.0 4.0 51.0No9175On Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 51.0 55.0 4.0 51.0No4875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 59.0 57.5 -1.5 51.0Yes3875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 50.5 58.0 7.5 51.0No6775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.07-
High needs- 60.07-
EL and Former EL- 60.07-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students15215199Yes152152100Yes4040100Yes
High needs858499Yes8585100Yes2222100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged5858100Yes5858100Yes16---
EL and Former EL14---14-------
Students w/ disabilities3232100Yes3232100Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---1---
Afr. Amer./Black13---13---4---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White11411399Yes114114100Yes3232100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles