Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Martha Jones

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Martha Jones

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.5, Target = 97.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 94.5, Target = 97.7 75 or Higher All Students 96.0 90.5 94.5 4.0 97.7 98.0 92163100Above Target
High needsCPI = 85.5, Target = 93.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 85.5, Target = 93.1 75 or Higher High needs 88.1 70.4 85.5 15.1 93.1 94.1 883850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 82.4, Target = 92.1 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 82.4, Target = 92.1 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 86.4 65.5 82.4 16.9 92.1 93.2 922775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  95.0---- 97.5-25--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.6, Target = 97.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 93.6, Target = 97.6 75 or Higher White 95.8 90.2 93.6 3.4 97.6 97.9 8212975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.7, Target = 97 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 93.7, Target = 97 75 or Higher All Students 94.8 91.5 93.7 2.2 97.0 97.4 8816275On Target
High needsCPI = 82.2, Target = 90.3 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 82.2, Target = 90.3 75 or Higher High needs 83.3 73.0 82.2 9.2 90.3 91.7 763850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.9, Target = 88.3 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 76.9, Target = 88.3 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 80.0 68.1 76.9 8.8 88.3 90.0 812750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  98.8---- 99.4-25--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.6, Target = 97 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 92.6, Target = 97 75 or Higher White 94.9 91.0 92.6 1.6 97.0 97.5 7812875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89, Target = 95.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 89, Target = 95.6 75 or Higher All Students 92.4 91.7 89.0 -2.7 95.6 96.2 805775On Target
High needs -------13--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------2--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.6, Target = 96.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 88.6, Target = 96.2 75 or Higher White 93.4 90.6 88.6 -2.0 96.2 96.7 684425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 30.5 38.016325 3.7 0.016325
High needs 7.9 10.53825 13.2 0.03825
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 3.4 7.42725 17.2 0.02725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--25---25-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.8 34.112925 3.8 0.012925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 42.7 54.316225 1.8 1.91620
High needs 10.5 23.73825 7.9 5.33825
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 6.9 7.4270 10.3 7.42725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--25---25-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.6 48.412825 2.3 2.31280
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 33.3 21.1570 3.7 1.85725
High needs--13---13-
Econ. Disadvantaged--2---2-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.1 22.7440 4.4 2.34425
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 72, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 64.0 72.0 8.0 51.0Yes113100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60.5, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 37.0 60.5 23.5 51.0Yes24100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-4--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-16--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 71, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 71, Target = 51SGP = 71, Target = 5175 or Higher White 66.0 71.0 5.0 51.0Yes89100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 46.0 55.5 9.5 51.0Yes11275On Target
High needsSGP = 52.5, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 38.0 52.5 14.5 51.0Yes24100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-4--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-16--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher White 44.0 54.0 10.0 51.0Yes8875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students164164100Yes16416399Yes5757100Yes
High needs3838100Yes3838100Yes13---
Econ. Disadvantaged9---9---2---
EL and Former EL3---3-------
Students w/ disabilities2727100Yes2727100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2525100Yes2525100Yes8---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino7---7---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White129129100Yes12912899Yes4444100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles