Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mittineague

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Mittineague

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.3, Target = 90.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 84.3, Target = 90.4 75 or Higher All Students 83.6 83.2 84.3 1.1 90.4 91.8 449150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.7, Target = 88.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 77.7, Target = 88.5 75 or Higher High needs 80.3 79.5 77.7 -1.8 88.5 90.2 605625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.4, Target = 82.3 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 81.4, Target = 82.375 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 80.7 80.7 81.4 0.7 82.3 90.4 724775On Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.9, Target = 89.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 86.9, Target = 89.9 75 or Higher White 82.7 83.9 86.9 3.0 89.9 91.4 436550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.9, Target = 88.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 84.9, Target = 88.9 75 or Higher All Students 80.9 80.1 84.9 4.8 88.9 90.5 489150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 78.6, Target = 86.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 78.6, Target = 86.4 75 or Higher High needs 76.6 76.0 78.6 2.6 86.4 88.3 625650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.3, Target = 78.1 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 80.3, Target = 78.1CPI = 80.3, Target = 78.175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 76.1 76.1 80.3 4.2 78.1 88.1 6847100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.5, Target = 89.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 86.5, Target = 89.4 75 or Higher White 81.8 79.2 86.5 7.3 89.4 90.9 416550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 73, Target = 86.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 73, Target = 86.5 75 or Higher All Students 76.8 75.0 73.0 -2.0 86.5 88.4 292525No Change
High needs -------16--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------18--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 11.4 14.39125 2.5 9.9910
High needs 6.0 8.95625 2.0 16.1560
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.8 10.64725 0.0 12.8470
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.9 16.96525 3.4 7.7650
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 22.8 37.49125 13.9 7.79125
High needs 16.0 25.05625 18.0 12.55625
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.2 27.74725 18.2 12.84725
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.1 40.06525 18.6 4.66525
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 15.4 0.0250 11.5 8.02525
High needs--16---16-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--18---18-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 70.5 63.0 -7.5 51.0Yes58100Above Target
High needsSGP = 64, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 66.0 64.0 -2.0 51.0Yes37100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 70.5, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 70.5, Target = 51SGP = 70.5, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 66.0 70.5 4.5 51.0Yes30100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 62, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 5175 or Higher White 65.0 62.0 -3.0 51.0Yes44100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 55.5 48.0 -7.5 51.0Yes5875On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 49, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 47.5 49.0 1.5 51.0Yes3775On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 53.5, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 47.5 53.5 6.0 51.0Yes3075On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 55.5 48.0 -7.5 51.0Yes4475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students101101100Yes101101100Yes3333100Yes
High needs6363100Yes6363100Yes23---
Econ. Disadvantaged5454100Yes5454100Yes20---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities23---23---10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2---1---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---1---
Hispanic/Latino21---21---9---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White6969100Yes6969100Yes21---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles