Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Memorial
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Memorial
Organization Information
District:West Springfield (03320000)School type:Elementary School
School:Memorial (03320025)Grades served:01,02,03,04,05
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.2, Target = 82.3CPI = 80.2, Target = 82.3CPI = 80.2, Target = 82.3 69.7 77.4 80.2 2.8 82.3 84.9 2813150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.1, Target = 80.9CPI = 79.1, Target = 80.9CPI = 79.1, Target = 80.9 67.3 75.0 79.1 4.1 80.9 83.7 669850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.3, Target = 75.8CPI = 79.3, Target = 75.8CPI = 79.3, Target = 75.8 73.6 73.6 79.3 5.7 75.8 86.8 6292100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 73.7, Target = 80.9CPI = 73.7, Target = 80.9CPI = 73.7, Target = 80.9 67.2 71.2 73.7 2.5 80.9 83.6 553950Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.7, Target = 82.5CPI = 84.7, Target = 82.5CPI = 84.7, Target = 82.5 70.0 80.7 84.7 4.0 82.5 85.0 3177100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.7, Target = 85.9CPI = 81.7, Target = 85.9CPI = 81.7, Target = 85.9 75.9 79.6 81.7 2.1 85.9 88.0 3213150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 81.1, Target = 84CPI = 81.1, Target = 84CPI = 81.1, Target = 84 72.5 77.7 81.1 3.4 84.0 86.3 729850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.1, Target = 80.9CPI = 82.1, Target = 80.9CPI = 82.1, Target = 80.9 79.2 79.2 82.1 2.9 80.9 89.6 759275On Target
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 76.9, Target = 82.2CPI = 76.9, Target = 82.2CPI = 76.9, Target = 82.2 69.5 76.3 76.9 0.6 82.2 84.8 653950Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.1, Target = 87.7CPI = 84.1, Target = 87.7CPI = 84.1, Target = 87.7 78.9 81.8 84.1 2.3 87.7 89.5 297750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.9, Target = 78.4CPI = 86.9, Target = 78.4CPI = 86.9, Target = 78.4 62.9 69.4 86.9 17.5 78.4 81.5 7244100Above Target
High needsCPI = 84.4, Target = 77.5CPI = 84.4, Target = 77.5CPI = 84.4, Target = 77.5 61.5- 84.4 7.1 77.5 80.8 9332100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------30--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White  67.9---- 84.0-32--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.8 6.91310 9.7 6.113125
High needs 7.3 6.1980 13.4 7.19825
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.9 5.4920 13.9 6.59225
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino 12.8 0.0390 10.3 7.73925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.6 11.77725 9.1 6.57725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 22.1 23.71310 8.8 9.91310
High needs 19.5 20.4980 11.0 12.2980
Econ. Disadvantaged 20.8 20.7920 9.7 10.9920
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino 17.9 17.9390 17.9 12.83925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.8 28.67725 3.0 7.8770
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 5.6 13.64425 19.4 2.34425
High needs 9.4 12.53225 12.5 3.13225
Econ. Disadvantaged--30---30-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--32---32-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 47.0 35.0 -12.0 51.0No7525Below Target
High needsSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 50.0 35.0 -15.0 51.0No5325Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 44.0 35.0 -9.0 51.0Yes4975On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-25--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 48.5 34.5 -14.0 51.0No4425Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 33.0 31.0 -2.0 51.0Yes7575On Target
High needsSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 32.0 33.0 1.0 51.0Yes5375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 33.0 30.0 -3.0 51.0Yes4975On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-25--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51 39.0 27.0 -12.0 51.0Yes4475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students14314299Yes14314299Yes4747100Yes
High needs10910899Yes10910899Yes3535100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged10210199Yes10210199Yes3232100Yes
EL and Former EL17---17---7---
Students w/ disabilities21---21---9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian5---5-------
Afr. Amer./Black6---6-------
Hispanic/Latino474698Yes474698Yes12---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8080100Yes8080100Yes3434100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles