Massachusetts School and District Profiles

John R Fausey
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - John R Fausey
Organization Information
District:West Springfield (03320000)School type:Elementary School
School:John R Fausey (03320010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.7, Target = 92.8CPI = 92.7, Target = 92.8 87.7 93.2 92.7 -0.5 92.8 93.9 8326575On Target
High needsCPI = 86.3, Target = 88.1CPI = 86.3, Target = 88.1CPI = 86.3, Target = 88.1 79.6 87.9 86.3 -1.6 88.1 89.8 9110475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 89, Target = 91.8CPI = 89, Target = 91.8CPI = 89, Target = 91.8 91.0 91.0 89.0 -2.0 91.8 95.5 957575On Target
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75, Target = 84.8CPI = 75, Target = 84.8CPI = 75, Target = 84.8 73.9 81.6 75.0 -6.6 84.8 87.0 77380Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 93.9, Target = 93.6CPI = 93.9, Target = 93.6 89.1 93.8 93.9 0.1 93.6 94.6 8420875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.5, Target = 93.2CPI = 92.5, Target = 93.2 88.4 92.5 92.5 0.0 93.2 94.2 8226375On Target
High needsCPI = 88.1, Target = 89.3CPI = 88.1, Target = 89.3CPI = 88.1, Target = 89.3 81.7 88.6 88.1 -0.5 89.3 90.9 9310375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 90.5, Target = 91.8CPI = 90.5, Target = 91.8CPI = 90.5, Target = 91.8 91.0 91.0 90.5 -0.5 91.8 95.5 967475On Target
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 79.6, Target = 85.8CPI = 79.6, Target = 85.8CPI = 79.6, Target = 85.8 75.7 85.7 79.6 -6.1 85.8 87.9 87380Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 92.9, Target = 93.8CPI = 92.9, Target = 93.8 89.3 93.1 92.9 -0.2 93.8 94.7 8020775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86, Target = 89.4CPI = 86, Target = 89.4CPI = 86, Target = 89.4 81.8 94.5 86.0 -8.5 89.4 90.9 671050Declined
High needsCPI = 80.6, Target = 81.7CPI = 80.6, Target = 81.7CPI = 80.6, Target = 81.7 68.6 90.4 80.6 -9.8 81.7 84.3 894075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  89.6---- 94.8-26--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.3, Target = 90.1CPI = 87.3, Target = 90.1CPI = 87.3, Target = 90.1 83.1 95.2 87.3 -7.9 90.1 91.6 62830Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.8 19.62650 1.2 3.02650
High needs 4.9 8.710425 1.9 6.71040
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.3 12.07525 0.0 5.3750
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 2.0 2.63825 4.1 15.8380
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--23---23-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 20.1 20.72080 0.5 1.92080
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 38.8 51.326325 0.4 1.92630
High needs 17.5 38.810325 1.0 3.91030
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.3 47.37425 1.3 2.7740
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 6.1 15.83825 0.0 5.3380
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--22---22-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 40.2 52.220725 0.0 1.02070
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 38.2 26.71050 0.0 2.91050
High needs 17.6 17.5400 0.0 2.5400
Econ. Disadvantaged--26---26-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 42.3 27.7830 0.0 2.4830
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 70.0 58.0 -12.0 51.0No18775On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 66.0 53.0 -13.0 51.0No6775On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 65.0 53.0 -12.0 51.0No4975On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 77.0 46.0 -31.0 51.0No2450Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51 67.5 58.5 -9.0 51.0Yes15075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 73.0 55.0 -18.0 51.0Yes18575On Target
High needsSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 65.0 49.5 -15.5 51.0Yes6675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 77.0 51.5 -25.5 51.0No4875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 64.0 34.0 -30.0 51.0No2425Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 74.5 56.0 -18.5 51.0Yes14975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students27327199Yes27126999Yes107107100Yes
High needs10710598Yes10610498Yes4141100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged777699Yes767599Yes2727100Yes
EL and Former EL8---8---2---
Students w/ disabilities403895Yes403895Yes17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian15---15---8---
Afr. Amer./Black11---11---5---
Hispanic/Latino23---22---8---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White21621499Yes21521399Yes8585100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles