Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Westport Senior High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2016 Accountability Data - Westport Senior High School

Organization Information
District:Westport (03310000)School type:High School
School:Westport Senior High School (03310505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.8, Target = 96.6CPI = 95.8, Target = 96.6 94.2 98.1 95.8 -2.3 96.6 97.1 246675On Target
High needsCPI = 87.5, Target = 92.9CPI = 87.5, Target = 92.9CPI = 87.5, Target = 92.9 87.8 95.3 87.5 -7.8 92.9 93.9 10220Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.4, Target = 96.9CPI = 95.4, Target = 96.9CPI = 95.4, Target = 96.9 94.7 98.2 95.4 -2.8 96.9 97.4 8600Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 93.4CPI = 91, Target = 93.4CPI = 91, Target = 93.4 88.7 91.2 91.0 -0.2 93.4 94.4 426725No Change
High needsCPI = 80.7, Target = 88.6CPI = 80.7, Target = 88.6CPI = 80.7, Target = 88.6 80.4 79.7 80.7 1.0 88.6 90.2 412250Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.8, Target = 93.7CPI = 90.8, Target = 93.7CPI = 90.8, Target = 93.7 89.2 90.8 90.8 0.0 93.7 94.6 256025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.8, Target = 91.1CPI = 94.8, Target = 91.1CPI = 94.8, Target = 91.1 84.8 93.9 94.8 0.9 91.1 92.4 6958100Above Target
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.6, Target = 91.3CPI = 94.6, Target = 91.3CPI = 94.6, Target = 91.3 85.0 93.7 94.6 0.9 91.3 92.5 5856100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 50.0 37.9660 1.0 3.0660
High needs 25.0 4.5220 3.1 9.1220
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 48.5 40.0600 1.0 3.3600
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 43.1 38.8670 3.9 1.56725
High needs 15.6 22.72225 12.5 4.52225
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 40.8 40.0600 4.1 1.76025
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 32.3 24.1580 0.0 1.7580
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--6---6-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.5 25.0560 0.0 1.8560
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51 55.5 40.5 -15.0 51.0No5650Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-16--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 53.5 43.0 -10.5 51.0No5350Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 36.0 32.0 -4.0 51.0No5825Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-16--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 35.5, Target = 51SGP = 35.5, Target = 51SGP = 35.5, Target = 51 35.0 35.5 0.5 51.0No5450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 80 92.2 91.2 -1.0 80.0 90.09175On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 84.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.4, Target = 80 81.4 84.4 3.0 80.0 90.04575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.017--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.01--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 93.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.2, Target = 80 93.0 93.2 0.2 80.0 90.08875On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 94, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94, Target = 85 95.0 94.0 -1.0 85.0 95.011675On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 83.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.7, Target = 85 91.1 83.7 -7.4 85.0 95.0430Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.018--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.02--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 94.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.7, Target = 85 94.8 94.7 -0.1 85.0 95.011475On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1.2, Target = 1.4 2.4 1.6 1.2 0.4 1.4 1.24633375On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 2.8, Target = 2.1 3.6 3.4 2.8 0.6 2.1 1.83710650Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------70--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------51--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.9, Target = 1.5 2.5 1.6 0.9 0.7 1.5 1.34432175On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students696597Yes696797Yes6969100Yes
High needs232196Yes232296Yes23---
Econ. Disadvantaged18---18---18---
EL and Former EL2---2---2---
Students w/ disabilities7---7---7---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---2---
Hispanic/Latino3---3---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White626097Yes626097Yes6262100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles