Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Country
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Country
Organization Information
District:Weston (03300000)School type:Elementary School
School:Country (03300010)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.1, Target = 94.5CPI = 93.1, Target = 94.5CPI = 93.1, Target = 94.5 90.5 89.3 93.1 3.8 94.5 95.3 809475On Target
High needs -------21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.1, Target = 95.7CPI = 95.1, Target = 95.7 92.7 89.3 95.1 5.8 95.7 96.4 855675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.5, Target = 93.5CPI = 91.5, Target = 93.5CPI = 91.5, Target = 93.5 88.9 96.8 91.5 -5.3 93.5 94.5 56940Declined
High needs -------21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.6, Target = 94.7CPI = 94.6, Target = 94.7 90.9 96.4 94.6 -1.8 94.7 95.5 745675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.8 24.59425 3.9 3.29425
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.0 21.4560 5.4 1.85625
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 57.1 60.6940 1.3 6.4940
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 58.9 60.7560 1.8 3.6560
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 51.0----
High needs --- 51.0----
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0----
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0----
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 51.0----
High needs --- 51.0----
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0----
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0----
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.010-
High needs- 60.010-
EL and Former EL- 60.010-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students9898100Yes9898100Yes----
High needs22---22-------
Econ. Disadvantaged6---6-------
EL and Former EL9---9-------
Students w/ disabilities13---13-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian16---16-------
Afr. Amer./Black10---10-------
Hispanic/Latino6---6-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White5858100Yes5858100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles