Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Southampton Road
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Southampton Road
Organization Information
District:Westfield (03250000)School type:Elementary School
School:Southampton Road (03250040)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.1, Target = 92.2CPI = 83.1, Target = 92.2CPI = 83.1, Target = 92.2 86.6 85.0 83.1 -1.9 92.2 93.3 3822825No Change
High needsCPI = 72.7, Target = 85.1CPI = 72.7, Target = 85.1CPI = 72.7, Target = 85.1 74.5 74.2 72.7 -1.5 85.1 87.3 359925No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.6, Target = 80.3CPI = 76.6, Target = 80.3CPI = 76.6, Target = 80.3 78.5 78.5 76.6 -1.9 80.3 89.3 497725No Change
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 53.3, Target = 70.4CPI = 53.3, Target = 70.4CPI = 53.3, Target = 70.4 49.3 57.4 53.3 -4.1 70.4 74.7 20460Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino  70.5---- 85.3-27--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.3, Target = 93.2CPI = 83.3, Target = 93.2CPI = 83.3, Target = 93.2 88.3 85.6 83.3 -2.3 93.2 94.2 2419025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.6, Target = 90CPI = 86.6, Target = 90CPI = 86.6, Target = 90 82.9 85.5 86.6 1.1 90.0 91.5 5422750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.8, Target = 82.5CPI = 77.8, Target = 82.5CPI = 77.8, Target = 82.5 70.0 73.4 77.8 4.4 82.5 85.0 589850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.9, Target = 79.3CPI = 80.9, Target = 79.3CPI = 80.9, Target = 79.3 77.4 77.4 80.9 3.5 79.3 88.7 7076100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 63.3, Target = 68.3CPI = 63.3, Target = 68.3CPI = 63.3, Target = 68.3 45.6 57.4 63.3 5.9 68.3 72.8 464550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino  61.4---- 80.7-27--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.3, Target = 91.4CPI = 87.3, Target = 91.4CPI = 87.3, Target = 91.4 85.3 86.4 87.3 0.9 91.4 92.7 4618950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.6, Target = 90.5CPI = 85.6, Target = 90.5CPI = 85.6, Target = 90.5 83.7 81.3 85.6 4.3 90.5 91.9 667150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 82.2CPI = 75, Target = 82.2CPI = 75, Target = 82.2 69.4 68.5 75.0 6.5 82.2 84.7 743050Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.1, Target = 92.4CPI = 85.1, Target = 92.4CPI = 85.1, Target = 92.4 87.0 81.7 85.1 3.4 92.4 93.5 516250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.4 7.92280 4.1 7.02280
High needs 8.6 3.0990 9.7 14.1990
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.7 3.9770 5.6 11.7770
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 2.9 0.0460 20.6 30.4460
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--27---27-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.3 7.91900 3.8 6.81900
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.1 27.82270 5.5 4.422725
High needs 16.1 21.49825 11.8 10.29825
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.1 26.37625 11.1 9.27625
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 5.9 4.4450 17.6 17.8450
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--27---27-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.3 29.11890 5.9 4.218925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.4 22.57125 9.2 2.87125
High needs 6.5 6.7300 19.4 6.73025
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.7 22.66225 6.7 3.26225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 44.0 49.0 5.0 51.0No15350Below Target
High needsSGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51 44.0 39.5 -4.5 51.0No6625Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 36.0 34.5 -1.5 51.0No5025Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-30--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 41.0 48.0 7.0 51.0No13250Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 41.5 58.0 16.5 51.0No154100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 38.0 60.0 22.0 51.0Yes67100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 48.0 60.0 12.0 51.0Yes51100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-31--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 42.5 56.5 14.0 51.0No13275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students231231100Yes230230100Yes7171100Yes
High needs102102100Yes101101100Yes3030100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged7979100Yes7878100Yes22---
EL and Former EL3---3---1---
Students w/ disabilities4848100Yes4747100Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---2---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino2929100Yes2929100Yes5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White191191100Yes190190100Yes6262100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles