Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Munger Hill
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Munger Hill
Organization Information
District:Westfield (03250000)School type:Elementary School
School:Munger Hill (03250033)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.7, Target = 93.4CPI = 83.7, Target = 93.4CPI = 83.7, Target = 93.4 88.7 82.4 83.7 1.3 93.4 94.4 4022650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 67.2, Target = 87.3CPI = 67.2, Target = 87.3CPI = 67.2, Target = 87.3 78.2 63.0 67.2 4.2 87.3 89.1 168750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 72.1, Target = 69.1CPI = 72.1, Target = 69.1CPI = 72.1, Target = 69.1 66.3 66.3 72.1 5.8 69.1 83.2 2851100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 56.7, Target = 85.7CPI = 56.7, Target = 85.7CPI = 56.7, Target = 85.7 75.4 53.1 56.7 3.6 85.7 87.7 286050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 85.6, Target = 93.5CPI = 85.6, Target = 93.5CPI = 85.6, Target = 93.5 88.9 83.0 85.6 2.6 93.5 94.5 3619150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 82.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 82.4, Target = 90.7 84.0 79.3 82.4 3.1 90.7 92.0 3622550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.5, Target = 82CPI = 62.5, Target = 82CPI = 62.5, Target = 82 69.1 54.0 62.5 8.5 82.0 84.6 88650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.5, Target = 63.9CPI = 67.5, Target = 63.9CPI = 67.5, Target = 63.9 60.6 60.6 67.5 6.9 63.9 80.3 1750100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 50.8, Target = 80CPI = 50.8, Target = 80CPI = 50.8, Target = 80 65.7 42.9 50.8 7.9 80.0 82.9 155950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 83, Target = 90.9CPI = 83, Target = 90.9CPI = 83, Target = 90.9 84.4 78.7 83.0 4.3 90.9 92.2 2419050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.5, Target = 94.5CPI = 85.5, Target = 94.5CPI = 85.5, Target = 94.5 90.6 86.7 85.5 -1.2 94.5 95.3 667425No Change
High needs  80.0---- 90.0-30--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  80.2---- 90.1-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.1, Target = 95CPI = 85.1, Target = 95CPI = 85.1, Target = 95 91.5 85.9 85.1 -0.8 95.0 95.8 516225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.0 6.22260 12.0 9.322625
High needs 1.3 0.0870 30.7 21.88725
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.5 0.0510 30.0 19.65125
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0600 41.1 31.76025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 14.9 7.31910 11.4 7.919125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 28.0 24.92250 15.5 10.722525
High needs 4.0 3.5860 41.3 27.98625
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.0 6.05025 35.0 28.05025
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 1.8 0.0590 55.4 40.75925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 28.0 26.31900 16.0 10.019025
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 36.7 25.7740 6.7 5.47425
High needs--30---30-
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 38.2 25.8620 7.3 6.56225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 53.0 53.0 0.0 51.0No15175On Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 51.0 46.0 -5.0 51.0No5350Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-29--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 49.0 41.5 -7.5 51.0No3650Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 54.0 56.0 2.0 51.0No12975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 63.0 63.0 0.0 51.0No151100Above Target
High needsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 46.0 62.0 16.0 51.0No53100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-29--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 42.0 53.0 11.0 51.0No3675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 64.0 65.0 1.0 51.0No129100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students231230100Yes23122999Yes757499Yes
High needs919099Yes918998Yes313097Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged555498Yes555396Yes18---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities636298Yes636197Yes212095Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---2---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4-------
Hispanic/Latino15---15---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---7---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White194194100Yes19419399Yes6262100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles