Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Franklin Ave
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Franklin Ave
Organization Information
District:Westfield (03250000)School type:Elementary School
School:Franklin Ave (03250015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.3, Target = 84.1CPI = 81.3, Target = 84.1CPI = 81.3, Target = 84.1 72.8 82.0 81.3 -0.7 84.1 86.4 3010725No Change
High needsCPI = 77.3, Target = 82.2CPI = 77.3, Target = 82.2CPI = 77.3, Target = 82.2 69.4 77.7 77.3 -0.4 82.2 84.7 586625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.8, Target = 80.8CPI = 78.8, Target = 80.8CPI = 78.8, Target = 80.8 79.0 79.0 78.8 -0.2 80.8 89.5 595925No Change
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 72.5, Target = 78.4CPI = 72.5, Target = 78.4CPI = 72.5, Target = 78.4 63.0 63.5 72.5 9.0 78.4 81.5 513050Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84, Target = 85.3CPI = 84, Target = 85.3CPI = 84, Target = 85.3 74.8 87.7 84.0 -3.7 85.3 87.4 28670Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.2, Target = 77CPI = 83.2, Target = 77CPI = 83.2, Target = 77 60.5 77.3 83.2 5.9 77.0 80.3 40107100Above Target
High needsCPI = 78, Target = 75CPI = 78, Target = 75CPI = 78, Target = 75 57.1 73.3 78.0 4.7 75.0 78.6 5966100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.5, Target = 76.7CPI = 80.5, Target = 76.7CPI = 80.5, Target = 76.7 74.6 74.6 80.5 5.9 76.7 87.3 6859100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 71.7, Target = 73.3CPI = 71.7, Target = 73.3CPI = 71.7, Target = 73.3 54.3 56.7 71.7 15.0 73.3 77.2 433050Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.6, Target = 77.9CPI = 86.6, Target = 77.9CPI = 86.6, Target = 77.9 62.1 82.7 86.6 3.9 77.9 81.1 4267100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.6, Target = 76.8CPI = 83.6, Target = 76.8CPI = 83.6, Target = 76.8 60.2 62.2 83.6 21.4 76.8 80.1 6035100Above Target
High needsCPI = 76.1, Target = 73.8CPI = 76.1, Target = 73.8CPI = 76.1, Target = 73.8 55.1 57.4 76.1 18.7 73.8 77.6 7722100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------19--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.9 6.51070 5.3 6.51070
High needs 4.0 4.56625 5.3 9.1660
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.4 5.15925 4.4 8.5590
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 3.33025 15.4 10.03025
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.1 7.5670 2.5 6.0670
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 25.2 25.21070 13.5 8.410725
High needs 20.8 21.2660 18.1 13.66625
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.1 23.7590 16.9 10.25925
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino 3.8 6.73025 23.1 20.03025
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.1 32.8670 11.5 4.56725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.9 11.43525 29.3 2.93525
High needs 3.7 4.52225 33.3 4.52225
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--5---5-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--19---19-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 34.0 41.0 7.0 51.0No7250Below Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 34.5 37.0 2.5 51.0No4550Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 33.0 39.0 6.0 51.0No4150Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 42.0 47.0 5.0 51.0No4750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 47.0 54.5 7.5 51.0Yes7275On Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 47.0 47.0 0.0 51.0Yes4575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 44.0 47.0 3.0 51.0Yes4175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 47.0 58.0 11.0 51.0No4775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students120120100Yes120120100Yes3939100Yes
High needs7878100Yes7878100Yes2525100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged7171100Yes7171100Yes23---
EL and Former EL3---3---1---
Students w/ disabilities17---17---5---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---2---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino3737100Yes3737100Yes17---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White7373100Yes7373100Yes19---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles