Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Schofield
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Schofield
Organization Information
District:Wellesley (03170000)School type:Elementary School
School:Schofield (03170045)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.2, Target = 93.6 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 94.2, Target = 93.675 or Higher All Students 89.0 95.9 94.2 -1.7 93.6 94.5 90185100Above Target
High needsCPI = 80.9, Target = 80.6 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 80.9, Target = 80.675 or Higher High needs 66.8 84.0 80.9 -3.1 80.6 83.4 733875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.9, Target = 76.7 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-CPI = 76.9, Target = 76.775 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 60.1- 76.9 5.9 76.7 80.1 8227--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------23--
Afr. Amer./Black -------17--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96, Target = 96 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 96, Target = 9675 or Higher White 93.1 96.2 96.0 -0.2 96.0 96.6 95126100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.2, Target = 88.8 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 95.2, Target = 88.8CPI = 95.2, Target = 88.875 or Higher All Students 80.8 94.4 95.2 0.8 88.8 90.4 94183100Above Target
High needsCPI = 82.2, Target = 74.1 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 82.2, Target = 74.1CPI = 82.2, Target = 74.175 or Higher High needs 55.6 80.6 82.2 1.6 74.1 77.8 7638100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities  49.3---- 74.7-27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------23--
Afr. Amer./Black -------15--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.8, Target = 91.8 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 96.8, Target = 91.8CPI = 96.8, Target = 91.875 or Higher White 86.0 94.3 96.8 2.5 91.8 93.0 97126100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.5, Target = 86.2 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 87.5, Target = 86.2CPI = 87.5, Target = 86.275 or Higher All Students 76.4 86.5 87.5 1.0 86.2 88.2 7354100Above Target
High needs -------12--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------4--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.1, Target = 87.9 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 90.1, Target = 87.9CPI = 90.1, Target = 87.975 or Higher White 79.3 86.8 90.1 3.3 87.9 89.7 7638100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 25.3 29.218525 1.2 1.61850
High needs 2.8 5.33825 5.6 5.3380
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 3.727- 25.8 7.427-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--23---23-
Afr. Amer./Black--17---17-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.0 26.212625 1.7 0.812625
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 52.4 56.31830 2.4 1.618325
High needs 8.3 15.83825 11.1 7.93825
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--27---27-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--23---23-
Afr. Amer./Black--15---15-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 55.5 59.51260 3.4 0.012625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.0 16.7540 2.0 0.05425
High needs--12---12-
Econ. Disadvantaged--4---4-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.0 13.2380 2.8 0.03825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 64.0 60.0 -4.0 51.0No115100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-24--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-12--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 52, Target = 5175 or Higher White 59.0 52.0 -7.0 51.0No8175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 56.0 61.0 5.0 51.0No115100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-24--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-12--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 5175 or Higher White 54.0 61.0 7.0 51.0Yes81100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.06.00-
High needs- 60.06.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.06.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students187187100Yes18618599Yes565598Yes
High needs3838100Yes3838100Yes12---
Econ. Disadvantaged13---13---4---
EL and Former EL6---6---1---
Students w/ disabilities2727100Yes2727100Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian25---25---6---
Afr. Amer./Black17---16---7---
Hispanic/Latino10---10---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White126126100Yes126126100Yes3838100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles