Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph E Fiske
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Joseph E Fiske
Organization Information
District:Wellesley (03170000)School type:Elementary School
School:Joseph E Fiske (03170015)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.2, Target = 95.7 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 95.2, Target = 95.775 or Higher All Students 92.6 91.7 95.2 3.5 95.7 96.3 95183100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87.8, Target = 86.8 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 87.8, Target = 86.875 or Higher High needs 77.3 76.7 87.8 11.1 86.8 88.7 953975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  95.7---- 97.9-32--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.8, Target = 97.2 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 97.8, Target = 97.275 or Higher White 95.2 93.2 97.8 4.6 97.2 97.6 99113100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.9, Target = 93.4 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 92.9, Target = 93.475 or Higher All Students 88.7 87.9 92.9 5.0 93.4 94.4 8418375On Target
High needsCPI = 76.9, Target = 81.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 76.9, Target = 81.1 75 or Higher High needs 67.6 68.0 76.9 8.9 81.1 83.8 553950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  96.7---- 98.4-32--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.8, Target = 95.4 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 95.8, Target = 95.475 or Higher White 92.1 90.6 95.8 5.2 95.4 96.1 94113100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.8, Target = 85.2 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 90.8, Target = 85.2CPI = 90.8, Target = 85.275 or Higher All Students 74.6 82.7 90.8 8.1 85.2 87.3 8660100Above Target
High needs -------12--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------7--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.7, Target = 86.6 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 90.7, Target = 86.6CPI = 90.7, Target = 86.675 or Higher White 77.0 83.3 90.7 7.4 86.6 88.5 7943100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.3 23.518325 4.6 1.118325
High needs 6.8 7.73925 18.2 5.13925
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--32---32-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.6 23.011325 3.7 0.011325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 37.6 51.918325 8.1 2.718325
High needs 23.3 20.5390 27.9 10.33925
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--32---32-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 34.0 51.311325 3.8 0.011325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.7 28.36025 9.1 0.06025
High needs--12---12-
Econ. Disadvantaged--7---7-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--5---5-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.1 23.34325 6.1 0.04325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 52.0 63.0 11.0 51.0Yes117100Above Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 50, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 45.0 50.0 5.0 51.0Yes2675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-19--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 5175 or Higher White 52.5 63.0 10.5 51.0Yes71100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 50.0 64.5 14.5 51.0Yes116100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-25--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-19--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 5175 or Higher White 49.5 64.0 14.5 51.0Yes70100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 69.0 60.023.0025
High needs 69.0 60.023.0025
EL and Former EL- 60.023.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18818799Yes19018999Yes626198Yes
High needs4141100Yes4141100Yes12---
Econ. Disadvantaged22---22---7---
EL and Former EL13---13---1---
Students w/ disabilities15---15---5---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian353497Yes353497Yes8---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10-------
Hispanic/Latino19---19---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White113113100Yes115115100Yes4444100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles