Massachusetts School and District Profiles

James Russell Lowell
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - James Russell Lowell
Organization Information
District:Watertown (03140000)School type:Elementary School
School:James Russell Lowell (03140025)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89, Target = 91.2CPI = 89, Target = 91.2CPI = 89, Target = 91.2 84.9 87.1 89.0 1.9 91.2 92.5 6617550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76.7, Target = 86.6CPI = 76.7, Target = 86.6CPI = 76.7, Target = 86.6 77.0 76.1 76.7 0.6 86.6 88.5 547550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.1, Target = 81.8CPI = 82.1, Target = 81.8 80.1 80.1 82.1 2.0 81.8 90.1 754275On Target
EL and Former EL  83.6---- 91.8-25--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.2, Target = 81.5CPI = 62.2, Target = 81.5CPI = 62.2, Target = 81.5 68.2 65.5 62.2 -3.3 81.5 84.1 44390Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.6, Target = 91.5CPI = 90.6, Target = 91.5 85.5 87.4 90.6 3.2 91.5 92.8 6512575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.4, Target = 90.6CPI = 85.4, Target = 90.6CPI = 85.4, Target = 90.6 83.8 87.3 85.4 -1.9 90.6 91.9 5017625No Change
High needsCPI = 71.7, Target = 86.9CPI = 71.7, Target = 86.9CPI = 71.7, Target = 86.9 77.6 77.3 71.7 -5.6 86.9 88.8 31760Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.2, Target = 83.6CPI = 73.2, Target = 83.6CPI = 73.2, Target = 83.6 82.1 82.1 73.2 -8.9 83.6 91.1 37420Declined
EL and Former EL  81.4---- 90.7-25--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.1, Target = 81.5CPI = 58.1, Target = 81.5CPI = 58.1, Target = 81.5 68.2 68.8 58.1 -10.7 81.5 84.1 31400Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.3, Target = 92.2CPI = 86.3, Target = 92.2CPI = 86.3, Target = 92.2 86.6 87.6 86.3 -1.3 92.2 93.3 4012625No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.9, Target = 85CPI = 82.9, Target = 85CPI = 82.9, Target = 85 74.3 85.0 82.9 -2.1 85.0 87.2 576325No Change
High needsCPI = 64.8, Target = 78.5CPI = 64.8, Target = 78.5CPI = 64.8, Target = 78.5 63.2- 64.8 -8.4 78.5 81.6 41220Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.7, Target = 87.4CPI = 83.7, Target = 87.4CPI = 83.7, Target = 87.4 78.4- 83.7 3.1 87.4 89.2 444950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.8 20.61750 5.4 6.91750
High needs 4.5 1.3750 10.6 14.7750
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.1 2.4420 7.7 7.1420
EL and Former EL--25---25-
Students w/ disabilities 2.7 0.0390 18.9 25.6390
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.8 24.812525 5.9 5.61250
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 33.8 33.01760 6.1 7.41760
High needs 12.1 9.2760 13.6 14.5760
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.4 4.8420 10.3 16.7420
EL and Former EL--25---25-
Students w/ disabilities 5.6 10.04025 19.4 25.0400
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 35.4 38.91260 7.1 7.91260
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.1 22.26325 8.9 7.96325
High needs 17.1 9.1220 17.1 22.7220
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.3 22.4490 12.1 6.14925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 65.0 58.0 -7.0 51.0Yes10875On Target
High needsSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 49.0 50.5 1.5 51.0No4675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-26--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-12--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51 69.5 60.5 -9.0 51.0Yes78100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 63.0 38.0 -25.0 51.0No10825Below Target
High needsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 61.5 42.0 -19.5 51.0No4750Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-26--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-14--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 66.0 42.0 -24.0 51.0Yes7775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 66.0 60.03125
High needs 66.0 60.03125
EL and Former EL 66.0 60.031-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18818498Yes18818699Yes717099Yes
High needs878395Yes878598Yes302997Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged504796Yes504896Yes16---
EL and Former EL3030100Yes3030100Yes8---
Students w/ disabilities434096Yes434195Yes14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian16---16---5---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---1---
Hispanic/Latino23---23---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White13212998Yes13213098Yes535298Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles