Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Cunniff

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Cunniff

Organization Information
District:Watertown (03140000)School type:Elementary School
School:Cunniff (03140015)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.5, Target = 93.3CPI = 84.5, Target = 93.3CPI = 84.5, Target = 93.3 88.5 87.8 84.5 -3.3 93.3 94.3 451440Declined
High needsCPI = 75.8, Target = 87.7CPI = 75.8, Target = 87.7CPI = 75.8, Target = 87.7 78.9 78.2 75.8 -2.4 87.7 89.5 506525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.3, Target = 81.9CPI = 76.3, Target = 81.9CPI = 76.3, Target = 81.9 80.3 80.3 76.3 -4.0 81.9 90.2 48380Declined
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.4, Target = 80.3CPI = 64.4, Target = 80.3CPI = 64.4, Target = 80.3 66.3 72.3 64.4 -7.9 80.3 83.2 49330Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 87.4, Target = 94.5CPI = 87.4, Target = 94.5CPI = 87.4, Target = 94.5 90.5 87.8 87.4 -0.4 94.5 95.3 479925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.8, Target = 91.5CPI = 82.8, Target = 91.5CPI = 82.8, Target = 91.5 85.4 83.2 82.8 -0.4 91.5 92.7 3714425No Change
High needsCPI = 70, Target = 86.9CPI = 70, Target = 86.9CPI = 70, Target = 86.9 77.6 70.6 70.0 -0.6 86.9 88.8 256525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.1, Target = 74.7CPI = 67.1, Target = 74.7CPI = 67.1, Target = 74.7 72.4 72.4 67.1 -5.3 74.7 86.2 16380Declined
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65.2, Target = 78.4CPI = 65.2, Target = 78.4CPI = 65.2, Target = 78.4 63.0 61.5 65.2 3.7 78.4 81.5 533350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 87.4, Target = 91.6CPI = 87.4, Target = 91.6CPI = 87.4, Target = 91.6 85.6 85.7 87.4 1.7 91.6 92.8 469950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75.5, Target = 86CPI = 75.5, Target = 86CPI = 75.5, Target = 86 76.0 80.0 75.5 -4.5 86.0 88.0 35530Declined
High needs  63.1---- 81.6-25--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 81.6, Target = 87.5CPI = 81.6, Target = 87.5CPI = 81.6, Target = 87.5 78.5 82.3 81.6 -0.7 87.5 89.3 343425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 16.7 13.91440 3.5 6.31440
High needs 3.2 4.66525 8.1 10.8650
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.3 7.93825 5.3 10.5380
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0330 13.5 15.2330
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 16.3 13.1990 2.0 3.0990
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 29.2 31.31440 10.4 9.71440
High needs 19.4 15.4650 22.6 18.56525
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.7 23.7380 21.1 23.7380
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 8.1 6.1330 32.4 18.23325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 31.6 34.3990 8.2 6.19925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 4.4 5.75325 8.9 13.2530
High needs--25---25-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 3.2 8.83425 6.5 5.9340
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 68.0 54.0 -14.0 51.0No9675On Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 62.5 51.0 -11.5 51.0No3975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 69.5 53.0 -16.5 51.0No6475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 62.0 44.5 -17.5 51.0No9650Below Target
High needsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 60.0 34.0 -26.0 51.0No3925Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 65.0 49.0 -16.0 51.0No6450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.017-
High needs- 60.017-
EL and Former EL- 60.017-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students15715196Yes15715498Yes585697Yes
High needs777195Yes777496Yes292793No
Econ. Disadvantaged4545100Yes4545100Yes13---
EL and Former EL22---22---8---
Students w/ disabilities363395Yes363496Yes17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian8---8---2---
Afr. Amer./Black14---14---8---
Hispanic/Latino21---21---8---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White10610397Yes10610498Yes363597Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles