Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dolbeare
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Dolbeare
Organization Information
District:Wakefield (03050000)School type:Elementary School
School:Dolbeare (03050005)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.7, Target = 93.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 81.7, Target = 93.4 75 or Higher All Students 88.7 79.2 81.7 2.5 93.4 94.4 3215650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 59.7, Target = 84.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 59.7, Target = 84.4 75 or Higher High needs 73.2 59.5 59.7 0.2 84.4 86.6 44950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 50.7, Target = 81.4 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 50.7, Target = 81.4 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 68.1 48.6 50.7 2.1 81.4 84.1 153650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.3, Target = 93.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 80.3, Target = 93.4 75 or Higher White 88.7 78.4 80.3 1.9 93.4 94.4 1512750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.8, Target = 93.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 88.8, Target = 93.2 75 or Higher All Students 88.4 85.5 88.8 3.3 93.2 94.2 6515650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.4, Target = 81.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 72.4, Target = 81.9 75 or Higher High needs 69.0 66.0 72.4 6.4 81.9 84.5 344950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 66.7, Target = 77.9 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 66.7, Target = 77.9 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 62.1 60.0 66.7 6.7 77.9 81.1 563650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88, Target = 93.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 88, Target = 93.4 75 or Higher White 88.6 84.9 88.0 3.1 93.4 94.3 5012750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.1 10.915625 9.7 10.31560
High needs 2.0 4.14925 28.0 28.6490
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0360 37.1 38.9360
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.2 10.212725 9.7 11.81270
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.2 39.115625 6.5 4.515625
High needs 10.0 14.34925 20.0 12.24925
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 5.7 2.8360 28.6 16.73625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.9 37.012725 6.7 5.512725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 49.0 65.0 16.0 51.0Yes71100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-7--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 5175 or Higher White 51.0 60.0 9.0 51.0Yes61100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 46.0 62.0 16.0 51.0Yes71100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-7--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 5175 or Higher White 46.0 61.0 15.0 51.0Yes61100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students16116099Yes16116099Yes----
High needs525198Yes525198Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged20---20-------
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities393897Yes393897Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian6---6-------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino13---13-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White13113099Yes13113099Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles