Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Uxbridge High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Uxbridge High
Organization Information
District:Uxbridge (03040000)School type:High School
School:Uxbridge High (03040505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.2, Target = 98.1CPI = 97.2, Target = 98.1 96.7 96.3 97.2 0.9 98.1 98.4 3611875On Target
High needsCPI = 90.5, Target = 94.3CPI = 90.5, Target = 94.3CPI = 90.5, Target = 94.3 90.2 86.8 90.5 3.7 94.3 95.1 212950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.2, Target = 98.4CPI = 98.2, Target = 98.4 97.2 97.3 98.2 0.9 98.4 98.6 34110100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.1, Target = 95.5CPI = 91.1, Target = 95.5CPI = 91.1, Target = 95.5 92.3 90.0 91.1 1.1 95.5 96.2 4311850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 81, Target = 84.8CPI = 81, Target = 84.8CPI = 81, Target = 84.8 74.0 68.8 81.0 12.2 84.8 87.0 422950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.8, Target = 95.7CPI = 90.8, Target = 95.7CPI = 90.8, Target = 95.7 92.6 91.0 90.8 -0.2 95.7 96.3 2511225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.7, Target = 94.6CPI = 89.7, Target = 94.6CPI = 89.7, Target = 94.6 90.7 91.2 89.7 -1.5 94.6 95.4 3611225No Change
High needsCPI = 78.8, Target = 86.8CPI = 78.8, Target = 86.8CPI = 78.8, Target = 86.8 77.3 77.3 78.8 1.5 86.8 88.7 282650Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.8, Target = 95CPI = 89.8, Target = 95CPI = 89.8, Target = 95 91.5 93.3 89.8 -3.5 95.0 95.8 201050Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 44.6 42.41180 2.5 1.711825
High needs 20.6 24.12925 8.8 6.92925
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 47.3 43.61100 1.8 0.911025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 52.8 53.41180 8.9 1.711825
High needs 22.2 34.52925 30.6 6.92925
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 56.1 52.71120 7.9 1.811225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.6 18.81120 4.4 0.011225
High needs 3.1 19.22625 15.6 0.02625
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.2 18.11050 1.9 0.010525
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 47.0 54.0 7.0 51.0No10775On Target
High needs --- 51.0-23--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 46.0 52.0 6.0 51.0Yes10175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 48.0 54.0 6.0 51.0No10775On Target
High needs --- 51.0-24--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 48.0 54.5 6.5 51.0No10275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 71.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 71.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 71.2, Target = 80 86.7 71.2 -15.5 80.0 90.01250Declined
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 65.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 65.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 65.2, Target = 80 67.5 65.2 -2.3 80.0 90.04625No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.022--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.012--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.06--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 77.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 77.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 77.9, Target = 80 86.5 77.9 -8.6 80.0 90.01040Declined
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 85 90.8 91.2 0.4 85.0 95.011375On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 77.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 77.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 77.5, Target = 85 76.3 77.5 1.2 85.0 95.04025No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.021--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.02--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 91, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91, Target = 85 91.2 91.0 -0.2 85.0 95.011175On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 3.1, Target = 1.8 3.1 1.3 3.1 -1.8 1.8 1.6224850Declined
High needsDropout Rate = 5.1, Target = 4.6 7.8 2.8 5.1 -2.3 4.6 3.9201180Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------56--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------73--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------14--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 2.9, Target = 1.8 3.0 1.2 2.9 -1.7 1.8 1.5154410Declined
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12512298Yes12512197Yes125125100Yes
High needs323095Yes323097Yes3232100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged20---20---20---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities17---17---17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---3---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino5---5---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White11511297Yes11511499Yes115115100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles