Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Tyngsborough Middle

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Tyngsborough Middle

Organization Information

District:

Tyngsborough (03010000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Tyngsborough Middle (03010305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Northeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		93.5	91.2	90.9	-0.3	96.2	96.8	53	421	25	No Change
High needs		77.6	72.5	75.0	2.5	86.9	88.8	25	104	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		78.8	78.8	81.3	2.5	80.6	89.4	39	56	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		72.3	60.3	63.6	3.3	83.8	86.2	34	59	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		93.8	90.8	90.9	0.1	96.4	96.9	41	362	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.7	82.8	86.1	3.3	89.9	91.4	75	418	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		60.8	59.5	65.0	5.5	77.1	80.4	59	102	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.5	67.5	68.6	1.1	70.2	83.8	52	55	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		54.3	46.1	53.1	7.0	73.3	77.2	61	57	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		83.3	83.2	86.5	3.3	90.3	91.7	72	359	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.5	81.9	78.2	-3.7	85.1	87.3	62	155	0	Declined
High needs		53.3	65.0	60.0	-5.0	72.8	76.7	45	30	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		75.5	81.7	77.9	-3.8	85.7	87.8	48	130	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.3	10.5	421	0	4.5	5.7	421	0
High needs	3.0	1.9	104	0	18.0	20.2	104	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.8	3.6	56	0	11.3	12.5	56	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.7	0.0	59	0	31.0	33.9	59	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	11.8	9.9	362	0	5.2	5.8	362	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	13.9	19.6	418	25	9.7	8.1	418	25
High needs	0.0	5.9	102	25	35.0	29.4	102	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	10.9	55	25	24.5	23.6	55	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	57	0	51.7	45.6	57	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	12.6	18.7	359	25	9.0	8.1	359	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.4	4.5	155	25	4.2	7.7	155	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	30	0	16.7	30.0	30	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1.6	4.6	130	25	3.2	8.5	130	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		40.0	38.0	-2.0	51.0	No	408	25	Below Target
High needs		36.0	38.5	2.5	51.0	No	96	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		36.5	41.0	4.5	51.0	No	53	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		33.0	35.5	2.5	51.0	No	54	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		39.5	37.0	-2.5	51.0	No	350	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.5	51.0	0.5	51.0	Yes	404	75	On Target
High needs		44.0	41.0	-3.0	51.0	No	94	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		45.0	42.0	-3.0	51.0	No	52	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		39.5	35.5	-4.0	51.0	No	52	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		49.0	51.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	346	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	432	430	100	Yes	432	427	99	Yes	160	160	100	Yes
High needs	111	111	100	Yes	111	109	98	Yes	34	34	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	60	60	100	Yes	60	59	98	Yes	18	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	63	63	100	Yes	63	61	97	Yes	20	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-	13	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	15	-	-	-	15	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	370	369	100	Yes	370	366	99	Yes	133	133	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.