Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph G Luther
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Joseph G Luther
Organization Information
District:Swansea (02920000)School type:Elementary School
School:Joseph G Luther (02920020)Grades served:03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.8, Target = 92CPI = 86.8, Target = 92CPI = 86.8, Target = 92 86.3 84.5 86.8 2.3 92.0 93.2 5620550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75.4, Target = 87.2CPI = 75.4, Target = 87.2CPI = 75.4, Target = 87.2 78.0 79.2 75.4 -3.8 87.2 89.0 47640Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.3, Target = 81.7CPI = 78.3, Target = 81.7CPI = 78.3, Target = 81.7 80.0 80.0 78.3 -1.7 81.7 90.0 574625No Change
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.1, Target = 81CPI = 62.1, Target = 81CPI = 62.1, Target = 81 67.4 73.8 62.1 -11.7 81.0 83.7 43310Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.6, Target = 92CPI = 86.6, Target = 92CPI = 86.6, Target = 92 86.3 85.0 86.6 1.6 92.0 93.2 4119650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.8, Target = 89.2CPI = 89.8, Target = 89.2 81.5 86.9 89.8 2.9 89.2 90.8 6920575On Target
High needsCPI = 78.1, Target = 87.2CPI = 78.1, Target = 87.2CPI = 78.1, Target = 87.2 78.0 77.7 78.1 0.4 87.2 89.0 596450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.6, Target = 81.6CPI = 82.6, Target = 81.6 79.9 79.9 82.6 2.7 81.6 90.0 764675On Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 66.1, Target = 80.3CPI = 66.1, Target = 80.3CPI = 66.1, Target = 80.3 66.3 69.4 66.1 -3.3 80.3 83.2 55310Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.9, Target = 89.3CPI = 89.9, Target = 89.3 81.6 87.3 89.9 2.6 89.3 90.8 6219675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.6, Target = 92.2CPI = 90.6, Target = 92.2CPI = 90.6, Target = 92.2 86.7 86.5 90.6 4.1 92.2 93.4 865675On Target
High needs -------16--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.5, Target = 92.4CPI = 90.5, Target = 92.4CPI = 90.5, Target = 92.4 86.9 87.3 90.5 3.2 92.4 93.5 785575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.1 13.720525 4.0 5.92050
High needs 2.8 3.16425 6.9 17.2640
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.2 4.34625 6.7 15.2460
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 2.5 0.0310 10.0 29.0310
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.7 13.819625 3.7 5.61960
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 25.0 33.220525 7.5 4.920525
High needs 12.3 14.16425 15.1 12.56425
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.0 17.44625 10.9 8.74625
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 7.5 6.5310 25.0 25.8310
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.9 33.719625 7.4 4.619625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.4 35.75625 2.6 1.85625
High needs--16---16-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.2 36.45525 2.7 1.85525
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 42.0 45.0 3.0 51.0Yes11875On Target
High needsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 46.5 44.5 -2.0 51.0No3850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 47.0 46.5 -0.5 51.0No2850Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 43.0 45.0 2.0 51.0Yes11375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 56.0 64.0 8.0 51.0Yes118100Above Target
High needsSGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51 51.0 58.5 7.5 51.0No3875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 37.0 65.0 28.0 51.0No28100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 56.0 64.0 8.0 51.0Yes113100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students210209100Yes210209100Yes5656100Yes
High needs6767100Yes6767100Yes16---
Econ. Disadvantaged4949100Yes4949100Yes11---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities3232100Yes3232100Yes7---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino6---6---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White200199100Yes200199100Yes5555100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles