Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Elizabeth S Brown
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Elizabeth S Brown
Organization Information
District:Swansea (02920000)School type:Elementary School
School:Elizabeth S Brown (02920006)Grades served:03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.8, Target = 91.6CPI = 85.8, Target = 91.6CPI = 85.8, Target = 91.6 85.6 84.9 85.8 0.9 91.6 92.8 5029050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.4, Target = 84CPI = 77.4, Target = 84CPI = 77.4, Target = 84 72.6 71.9 77.4 5.5 84.0 86.3 598350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81, Target = 79.2CPI = 81, Target = 79.2CPI = 81, Target = 79.2 77.3 77.3 81.0 3.7 79.2 88.7 7162100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.5, Target = 80.1CPI = 67.5, Target = 80.1CPI = 67.5, Target = 80.1 65.9 58.3 67.5 9.2 80.1 83.0 593050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.7, Target = 91.8CPI = 86.7, Target = 91.8CPI = 86.7, Target = 91.8 85.9 85.5 86.7 1.2 91.8 93.0 4228150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.2, Target = 90.3CPI = 87.2, Target = 90.3CPI = 87.2, Target = 90.3 83.3 83.4 87.2 3.8 90.3 91.7 5829050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.7, Target = 83.5CPI = 77.7, Target = 83.5CPI = 77.7, Target = 83.5 71.7 67.1 77.7 10.6 83.5 85.9 588350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.7, Target = 75CPI = 82.7, Target = 75CPI = 82.7, Target = 75 72.7 72.7 82.7 10.0 75.0 86.4 7762100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 63.3, Target = 78.3CPI = 63.3, Target = 78.3CPI = 63.3, Target = 78.3 62.8 50.8 63.3 12.5 78.3 81.4 463050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.9, Target = 90.7CPI = 87.9, Target = 90.7CPI = 87.9, Target = 90.7 84.0 83.8 87.9 4.1 90.7 92.0 5028150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.1, Target = 86.9CPI = 79.1, Target = 86.9CPI = 79.1, Target = 86.9 77.6 89.4 79.1 -10.3 86.9 88.8 44910Declined
High needsCPI = 70.2, Target = 77.1CPI = 70.2, Target = 77.1CPI = 70.2, Target = 77.1 60.7 74.0 70.2 -3.8 77.1 80.4 59260Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.5, Target = 87.2CPI = 80.5, Target = 87.2CPI = 80.5, Target = 87.2 78.0 89.8 80.5 -9.3 87.2 89.0 29860Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.7 8.32900 3.5 4.12900
High needs 3.4 4.88325 11.2 9.68325
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.0 4.86225 4.5 8.1620
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 3.3 3.3300 26.7 13.33025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.7 8.22810 2.9 3.22810
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.8 30.729025 5.5 4.529025
High needs 5.6 14.58325 14.6 9.68325
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.6 17.76225 9.1 6.56225
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 6.73025 26.7 23.33025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.9 31.028125 5.8 3.928125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.8 11.0910 4.1 7.7910
High needs 7.7 7.7260 15.4 19.2260
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--6---6-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.0 10.5860 4.3 5.8860
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 44.5 47.0 2.5 51.0No19150Below Target
High needsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 40.0 38.0 -2.0 51.0Yes5175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 42.0 41.5 -0.5 51.0Yes3675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 43.5 46.5 3.0 51.0No18650Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 58.0 60.0 2.0 51.0Yes191100Above Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 54.0 53.0 -1.0 51.0Yes5175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 54.0 56.0 2.0 51.0Yes3675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 57.0 60.0 3.0 51.0Yes186100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students29829398Yes29829398Yes939198Yes
High needs878699Yes878699Yes2626100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged6565100Yes6565100Yes22---
EL and Former EL3---3---1---
Students w/ disabilities323197Yes323197Yes6---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino5---5---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White28728298Yes28728298Yes888698Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles