Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Sutton Middle School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Sutton Middle School
Organization Information
District:Sutton (02900000)School type:Middle School
School:Sutton Middle School (02900305)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.9, Target = 95.7CPI = 91.9, Target = 95.7CPI = 91.9, Target = 95.7 92.7 92.2 91.9 -0.3 95.7 96.4 5835325No Change
High needsCPI = 74.4, Target = 87.8CPI = 74.4, Target = 87.8CPI = 74.4, Target = 87.8 79.1 72.5 74.4 1.9 87.8 89.6 228750Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  79.3---- 89.7-33--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.7, Target = 83.6CPI = 67.7, Target = 83.6CPI = 67.7, Target = 83.6 71.9 68.9 67.7 -1.2 83.6 86.0 466225No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.6, Target = 96CPI = 91.6, Target = 96CPI = 91.6, Target = 96 93.1 92.4 91.6 -0.8 96.0 96.6 4632925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.2, Target = 90.9CPI = 82.2, Target = 90.9CPI = 82.2, Target = 90.9 84.4 81.5 82.2 0.7 90.9 92.2 6035350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 56.3, Target = 79.3CPI = 56.3, Target = 79.3CPI = 56.3, Target = 79.3 64.5 50.9 56.3 5.4 79.3 82.3 178750Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  59.8---- 79.9-33--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 50.4, Target = 72.6CPI = 50.4, Target = 72.6CPI = 50.4, Target = 72.6 53.1 46.7 50.4 3.7 72.6 76.6 506250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82, Target = 91.1CPI = 82, Target = 91.1CPI = 82, Target = 91.1 84.7 81.4 82.0 0.6 91.1 92.4 5132950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.4, Target = 86CPI = 78.4, Target = 86CPI = 78.4, Target = 86 76.0 81.2 78.4 -2.8 86.0 88.0 641160Declined
High needsCPI = 59.8, Target = 76.1CPI = 59.8, Target = 76.1CPI = 59.8, Target = 76.1 59.0 57.0 59.8 2.8 76.1 79.5 442350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.4, Target = 86.4CPI = 78.4, Target = 86.4CPI = 78.4, Target = 86.4 76.7 81.5 78.4 -3.1 86.4 88.4 501100Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.4 21.03530 4.9 4.53530
High needs 3.8 2.3870 20.3 16.18725
Econ. Disadvantaged--33---33-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 1.6 0.0620 21.3 21.0620
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.7 21.032925 4.7 4.93290
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.1 24.63530 12.1 11.93530
High needs 1.3 4.68725 44.3 36.88725
Econ. Disadvantaged--33---33-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 1.6 0.0620 49.2 45.2620
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.1 24.332925 12.4 12.23290
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.3 2.61160 8.5 6.011625
High needs 0.0 0.0230 36.0 21.72325
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 2.8 1.81100 7.7 6.411025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 54.0 54.0 0.0 51.0No34775On Target
High needsSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 54.0 53.5 -0.5 51.0No8275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-32--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 55.0 40.0 -15.0 51.0No5725Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 54.0 54.0 0.0 51.0No32375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 49.5 50.5 1.0 51.0No34675On Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 44.0 47.0 3.0 51.0No8250Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-32--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 44.5 44.0 -0.5 51.0No5750Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 48.0 50.0 2.0 51.0No32250Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students36236099Yes36236099Yes118118100Yes
High needs908999Yes908999Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3434100Yes3434100Yes9---
EL and Former EL3---3-------
Students w/ disabilities646398Yes646398Yes17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4-------
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---1---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.15---15---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White33733599Yes33733599Yes112112100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles