Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph H Gibbons
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Joseph H Gibbons
Organization Information
District:Stoughton (02850000)School type:Elementary School
School:Joseph H Gibbons (02850025)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.6, Target = 89.8CPI = 84.6, Target = 89.8CPI = 84.6, Target = 89.8 82.5 87.2 84.6 -2.6 89.8 91.3 451780Declined
High needsCPI = 74.6, Target = 79.5CPI = 74.6, Target = 79.5CPI = 74.6, Target = 79.5 64.8 76.2 74.6 -1.6 79.5 82.4 436525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.8, Target = 79.7CPI = 78.8, Target = 79.7 77.8 77.8 78.8 1.0 79.7 88.9 593975On Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 56.7, Target = 66.9CPI = 56.7, Target = 66.9CPI = 56.7, Target = 66.9 43.2 68.3 56.7 -11.6 66.9 71.6 28300Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.5, Target = 90.5CPI = 85.5, Target = 90.5CPI = 85.5, Target = 90.5 83.7 89.9 85.5 -4.4 90.5 91.9 351280Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.6, Target = 89.4CPI = 84.6, Target = 89.4CPI = 84.6, Target = 89.4 81.9 85.4 84.6 -0.8 89.4 91.0 4617825No Change
High needsCPI = 74.2, Target = 78.4CPI = 74.2, Target = 78.4CPI = 74.2, Target = 78.4 63.0 77.8 74.2 -3.6 78.4 81.5 43650Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.1, Target = 81.6CPI = 73.1, Target = 81.6CPI = 73.1, Target = 81.6 79.9 79.9 73.1 -6.8 81.6 90.0 36390Declined
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59.2, Target = 65.5CPI = 59.2, Target = 65.5CPI = 59.2, Target = 65.5 40.9 64.2 59.2 -5.0 65.5 70.5 35300Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.4, Target = 90.9CPI = 85.4, Target = 90.9CPI = 85.4, Target = 90.9 84.4 87.4 85.4 -2.0 90.9 92.2 3612825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.4, Target = 82.7CPI = 82.4, Target = 82.7 70.4 82.8 82.4 -0.4 82.7 85.2 555475On Target
High needs  57.4---- 78.7-21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.8, Target = 82.8CPI = 86.8, Target = 82.8CPI = 86.8, Target = 82.8 70.5 85.5 86.8 1.3 82.8 85.3 5938100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.9 14.01780 6.5 7.91780
High needs 9.7 7.7650 14.5 13.8650
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.1 12.83925 13.9 10.33925
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 3.3 0.0300 20.0 30.0300
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--13---13-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.5 14.11280 3.4 7.01280
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 32.7 35.41780 7.1 7.91780
High needs 17.7 21.56525 14.5 18.5650
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.9 30.83925 13.9 20.5390
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 16.7 3.3300 26.7 33.3300
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--13---13-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 34.5 37.51280 4.2 7.81280
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.4 16.7540 7.8 5.65425
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 41.9 21.1380 6.5 2.63825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 53.0 30.0 -23.0 51.0No1190Below Target
High needsSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 57.5 34.5 -23.0 51.0No4625Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-12--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-11--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 51.5 28.0 -23.5 51.0No860Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 54.5 30.0 -24.5 51.0No1190Below Target
High needsSGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51 51.0 26.0 -25.0 51.0No460Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-12--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-11--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 53.0 29.0 -24.0 51.0No860Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.07-
High needs- 60.07-
EL and Former EL- 60.07-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students181181100Yes181181100Yes5454100Yes
High needs6666100Yes6666100Yes2121100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3939100Yes3939100Yes14---
EL and Former EL11---11---5---
Students w/ disabilities3131100Yes3131100Yes8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian13---13---6---
Afr. Amer./Black16---16---6---
Hispanic/Latino10---10---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.13---13---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White129129100Yes129129100Yes3838100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles