Massachusetts School and District Profiles

German Gerena Community School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - German Gerena Community School

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

German Gerena Community School (02810195)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.8	70.5	70.7	0.2	71.3	75.4	10	254	75	On Target
High needs		49.7	67.0	68.1	1.1	70.7	74.9	19	225	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.3	67.3	67.8	0.5	70.0	83.7	17	209	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		42.7	64.7	64.9	0.2	66.6	71.4	32	92	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		41.0	52.9	55.0	2.1	65.6	70.5	25	50	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		70.2	-	-	-	-	85.1	-	35	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		50.3	69.9	69.7	-0.2	71.0	75.2	36	212	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		45.7	67.9	69.3	1.4	68.3	72.9	8	254	75	On Target
High needs		44.8	64.2	67.1	2.9	67.8	72.4	17	225	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.0	65.0	66.0	1.0	67.9	82.5	13	209	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		41.4	63.1	65.8	2.7	65.8	70.7	26	92	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		35.6	52.4	57.5	5.1	62.4	67.8	30	50	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		72.6	-	-	-	-	86.3	-	35	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		45.3	66.7	68.8	2.1	68.1	72.7	34	212	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		42.1	62.7	68.5	5.8	66.2	71.1	21	77	100	Above Target
High needs		41.5	57.1	65.1	8.0	65.9	70.8	42	68	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		58.2	58.2	64.7	6.5	61.7	79.1	49	63	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		37.5	-	-	-	-	68.8	-	28	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		41.0	62.3	66.4	4.1	65.6	70.5	66	61	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.1	2.8	254	0	14.2	16.9	254	0
High needs	2.1	2.7	225	25	16.5	19.1	225	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.2	2.4	209	0	16.3	20.1	209	0
EL and Former EL	1.3	2.2	92	25	20.0	19.6	92	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	50	0	32.6	32.0	50	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	35	-	-	-	35	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.4	2.8	212	25	14.6	17.9	212	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.4	9.8	254	25	19.1	19.3	254	0
High needs	6.2	8.4	225	25	22.3	21.3	225	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.6	7.7	209	25	20.3	22.5	209	0
EL and Former EL	2.5	5.4	92	25	25.0	22.8	92	0
Students w/ disabilities	4.8	2.0	50	0	45.2	30.0	50	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	35	-	-	-	35	-
Hispanic/Latino	6.8	9.0	212	25	20.0	19.3	212	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.6	7.8	77	25	20.6	18.2	77	25
High needs	1.9	7.4	68	25	24.5	20.6	68	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.0	6.3	63	25	22.4	20.6	63	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	28	-	-	-	28	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.8	8.2	61	25	21.1	21.3	61	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		55.0	36.0	-19.0	51.0	No	158	25	Below Target
High needs		51.5	36.0	-15.5	51.0	No	138	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.5	36.0	-14.5	51.0	No	130	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		60.0	42.0	-18.0	51.0	No	51	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		51.0	27.0	-24.0	51.0	No	25	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		57.0	35.0	-22.0	51.0	No	128	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.5	31.0	-16.5	51.0	No	157	25	Below Target
High needs		46.5	31.0	-15.5	51.0	Yes	137	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		45.0	29.0	-16.0	51.0	No	129	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		51.0	44.0	-7.0	51.0	Yes	51	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		41.0	35.0	-6.0	51.0	No	24	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		49.0	33.0	-16.0	51.0	Yes	128	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	0	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	66.0	60.0	116.00	25
High needs	66.0	60.0	116.00	25
EL and Former EL	66.0	60.0	116.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	275	274	100	Yes	274	274	100	Yes	82	82	100	Yes
High needs	246	245	100	Yes	245	245	100	Yes	73	73	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	228	227	100	Yes	227	227	100	Yes	68	68	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	101	100	99	Yes	101	101	100	Yes	30	30	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	57	56	98	Yes	56	56	100	Yes	17	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	38	38	100	Yes	38	38	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	227	226	100	Yes	226	226	100	Yes	63	63	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	3	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.