Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Arthur T Talmadge

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Arthur T Talmadge

Organization Information
District:Springfield (02810000)School type:Elementary School
School:Arthur T Talmadge (02810165)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.9, Target = 97.2CPI = 78.9, Target = 97.2CPI = 78.9, Target = 97.2 95.2 79.8 78.9 -0.9 97.2 97.6 2512725No Change
High needsCPI = 77.3, Target = 97.1CPI = 77.3, Target = 97.1CPI = 77.3, Target = 97.1 95.0 76.5 77.3 0.8 97.1 97.5 5810750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.2, Target = 79.6CPI = 78.2, Target = 79.6CPI = 78.2, Target = 79.6 77.7 77.7 78.2 0.5 79.6 88.9 5610150Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------13--
Students w/ disabilities  93.2---- 96.6-32--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 79.4, Target = 95.8CPI = 79.4, Target = 95.8CPI = 79.4, Target = 95.8 92.8- 79.4 1.3 95.8 96.4 734050Improved Below Target
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 75, Target = 98.7CPI = 75, Target = 98.7CPI = 75, Target = 98.7 97.7 77.2 75.0 -2.2 98.7 98.9 616225No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------21--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.1, Target = 93.6CPI = 80.1, Target = 93.6CPI = 80.1, Target = 93.6 89.0 80.2 80.1 -0.1 93.6 94.5 2712725No Change
High needsCPI = 78.7, Target = 93.2CPI = 78.7, Target = 93.2CPI = 78.7, Target = 93.2 88.3 76.8 78.7 1.9 93.2 94.2 6210750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.5, Target = 79.6CPI = 79.5, Target = 79.6 77.7 77.7 79.5 1.8 79.6 88.9 6510175On Target
EL and Former EL -------13--
Students w/ disabilities  89.8---- 94.9-32--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 83.1, Target = 91.3CPI = 83.1, Target = 91.3CPI = 83.1, Target = 91.3 85.1- 83.1 11.2 91.3 92.6 864050Improved Below Target
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 77.4, Target = 95CPI = 77.4, Target = 95CPI = 77.4, Target = 95 91.4 78.3 77.4 -0.9 95.0 95.7 676225No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------21--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 61.9, Target = 91.4CPI = 61.9, Target = 91.4CPI = 61.9, Target = 91.4 85.2 80.8 61.9 -18.9 91.4 92.6 15400Declined
High needsCPI = 59.1, Target = 90.4CPI = 59.1, Target = 90.4CPI = 59.1, Target = 90.4 83.6 75.9 59.1 -16.8 90.4 91.8 26330Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 60, Target = 79.7CPI = 60, Target = 79.7CPI = 60, Target = 79.7 77.8 77.8 60.0 -17.8 79.7 88.9 36300Declined
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------8--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 1.6 4.712725 8.9 10.21270
High needs 1.0 4.710725 11.1 11.21070
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.1 5.010125 9.6 9.91010
EL and Former EL--13---13-
Students w/ disabilities--32---32-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black 3.6 10.04025 5.4 12.5400
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 1.66225 8.7 11.3620
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--21---21-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 20.2 25.212725 8.1 7.91270
High needs 14.1 19.610725 10.1 8.410725
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.9 19.810125 9.6 6.910125
EL and Former EL--13---13-
Students w/ disabilities--32---32-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black 10.7 25.04025 12.5 5.04025
Hispanic/Latino 14.5 22.66225 5.8 11.3620
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--21---21-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 15.4 0.0400 12.8 27.5400
High needs 14.3 0.0330 17.9 30.3330
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.8 0.0300 14.8 30.0300
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--13---13-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--8---8-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 35.0 49.0 14.0 51.0No8275On Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 29.0 47.0 18.0 51.0No67100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 31.5 46.5 15.0 51.0No64100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 12.0 51.0 39.0 51.0Yes27100Above Target
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 29.0 47.0 18.0 51.0No37100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-17--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 48.0 52.0 4.0 51.0No8375On Target
High needsSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 41.0 50.5 9.5 51.0No6875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 39.5 51.0 11.5 51.0No6575On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 15.5 61.0 45.5 51.0Yes27100Above Target
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 43.0 44.0 1.0 51.0No3850Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-17--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.012-
High needs- 60.012-
EL and Former EL- 60.012-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students132132100Yes132132100Yes4141100Yes
High needs112112100Yes112112100Yes3434100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged106106100Yes106106100Yes3131100Yes
EL and Former EL13---13---5---
Students w/ disabilities3333100Yes3333100Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black4040100Yes4040100Yes13---
Hispanic/Latino6666100Yes6666100Yes20---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White22---22---8---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles