Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Arthur T Talmadge

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Arthur T Talmadge

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Arthur T Talmadge (02810165)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.2	79.8	78.9	-0.9	97.2	97.6	25	127	25	No Change
High needs		95.0	76.5	77.3	0.8	97.1	97.5	58	107	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.7	77.7	78.2	0.5	79.6	88.9	56	101	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		93.2	-	-	-	-	96.6	-	32	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		92.8	-	79.4	1.3	95.8	96.4	73	40	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		97.7	77.2	75.0	-2.2	98.7	98.9	61	62	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.0	80.2	80.1	-0.1	93.6	94.5	27	127	25	No Change
High needs		88.3	76.8	78.7	1.9	93.2	94.2	62	107	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.7	77.7	79.5	1.8	79.6	88.9	65	101	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		89.8	-	-	-	-	94.9	-	32	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		85.1	-	83.1	11.2	91.3	92.6	86	40	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		91.4	78.3	77.4	-0.9	95.0	95.7	67	62	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.2	80.8	61.9	-18.9	91.4	92.6	15	40	0	Declined
High needs		83.6	75.9	59.1	-16.8	90.4	91.8	26	33	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.8	77.8	60.0	-17.8	79.7	88.9	36	30	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.6	4.7	127	25	8.9	10.2	127	0
High needs	1.0	4.7	107	25	11.1	11.2	107	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.1	5.0	101	25	9.6	9.9	101	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	32	-	-	-	32	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3.6	10.0	40	25	5.4	12.5	40	0
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	1.6	62	25	8.7	11.3	62	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	20.2	25.2	127	25	8.1	7.9	127	0
High needs	14.1	19.6	107	25	10.1	8.4	107	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	14.9	19.8	101	25	9.6	6.9	101	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	32	-	-	-	32	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10.7	25.0	40	25	12.5	5.0	40	25
Hispanic/Latino	14.5	22.6	62	25	5.8	11.3	62	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.4	0.0	40	0	12.8	27.5	40	0
High needs	14.3	0.0	33	0	17.9	30.3	33	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	14.8	0.0	30	0	14.8	30.0	30	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		35.0	49.0	14.0	51.0	No	82	75	On Target
High needs		29.0	47.0	18.0	51.0	No	67	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		31.5	46.5	15.0	51.0	No	64	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		12.0	51.0	39.0	51.0	Yes	27	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		29.0	47.0	18.0	51.0	No	37	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	52.0	4.0	51.0	No	83	75	On Target
High needs		41.0	50.5	9.5	51.0	No	68	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		39.5	51.0	11.5	51.0	No	65	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		15.5	61.0	45.5	51.0	Yes	27	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		43.0	44.0	1.0	51.0	No	38	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	12.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	12.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	12.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	132	132	100	Yes	132	132	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes
High needs	112	112	100	Yes	112	112	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	106	106	100	Yes	106	106	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	33	33	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes	10	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	40	40	100	Yes	40	40	100	Yes	13	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	66	66	100	Yes	66	66	100	Yes	20	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-	8	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.