Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Liberty

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Liberty

Organization Information
District:Springfield (02810000)School type:Elementary School
School:Liberty (02810115)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.1, Target = 85.7CPI = 86.1, Target = 85.7 75.4 77.9 86.1 8.2 85.7 87.7 5212475On Target
High needsCPI = 84, Target = 85.2CPI = 84, Target = 85.2CPI = 84, Target = 85.2 74.6 75.8 84.0 8.2 85.2 87.3 8410075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.9, Target = 77.8CPI = 83.9, Target = 77.8CPI = 83.9, Target = 77.8 75.8 75.8 83.9 8.1 77.8 87.9 8395100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------29--
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 85.7, Target = 84.8CPI = 85.7, Target = 84.8 73.9 77.3 85.7 8.4 84.8 87.0 9210375On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------14--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.3, Target = 83.4CPI = 83.3, Target = 83.4 71.6 79.5 83.3 3.8 83.4 85.8 4112475On Target
High needsCPI = 79.5, Target = 83CPI = 79.5, Target = 83CPI = 79.5, Target = 83 70.8 76.1 79.5 3.4 83.0 85.4 6610050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.3, Target = 78.4CPI = 80.3, Target = 78.4CPI = 80.3, Target = 78.4 76.4 76.4 80.3 3.9 78.4 88.2 6895100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------29--
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 84, Target = 82.3CPI = 84, Target = 82.3CPI = 84, Target = 82.3 69.6 80.2 84.0 3.8 82.3 84.8 85103100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------14--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 73.2, Target = 80.6CPI = 73.2, Target = 80.6CPI = 73.2, Target = 80.6 66.7 73.6 73.2 -0.4 80.6 83.4 294125No Change
High needsCPI = 71.2, Target = 79.9CPI = 71.2, Target = 79.9CPI = 71.2, Target = 79.9 65.6 72.2 71.2 -1.0 79.9 82.8 623325No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged  74.0---- 87.0-30--
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 72.2, Target = 78.4CPI = 72.2, Target = 78.4CPI = 72.2, Target = 78.4 62.9 72.2 72.2 0.0 78.4 81.5 773625No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------3--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 4.9 3.21240 8.2 4.012425
High needs 3.2 3.01000 8.4 5.010025
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.3 3.2950 8.9 5.39525
EL and Former EL--29---29-
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino 3.1 1.91030 8.2 3.910325
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--14---14-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 19.0 16.11240 10.7 10.51240
High needs 17.9 13.01000 13.7 13.01000
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.7 13.7950 13.3 12.6950
EL and Former EL--29---29-
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino 17.5 15.51030 9.3 11.71030
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--14---14-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 10.8 2.4410 13.5 12.2410
High needs 11.1 0.0330 14.8 15.2330
Econ. Disadvantaged--30---30-
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino 7.4 2.8360 14.8 11.13625
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--3---3-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 50.0 60.0 10.0 51.0Yes75100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 54.0 60.0 6.0 51.0Yes59100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51 55.5 60.5 5.0 51.0Yes56100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 42.0 59.0 17.0 51.0Yes62100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-8--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 36.0 50.0 14.0 51.0Yes7575On Target
High needsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 33.0 45.0 12.0 51.0Yes5975On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 33.0 48.0 15.0 51.0Yes56100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 40.0 48.0 8.0 51.0Yes6275On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-8--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 46.0 60.0350
High needs 46.0 60.0350
EL and Former EL 46.0 60.035-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students141141100Yes141141100Yes4747100Yes
High needs116116100Yes116116100Yes3939100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged108108100Yes108108100Yes3434100Yes
EL and Former EL4040100Yes4040100Yes15---
Students w/ disabilities14---14---4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---2---
Hispanic/Latino117117100Yes117117100Yes4141100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White16---16---4---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles