Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Frederick Harris

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Frederick Harris

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Frederick Harris (02810080)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		75.8	75.7	79.1	3.4	85.9	87.9	26	237	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		72.6	72.5	75.6	3.1	84.0	86.3	48	180	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.2	72.2	76.0	3.8	74.5	86.1	47	169	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		54.0	67.4	72.0	4.6	73.2	77.0	56	42	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		60.5	58.1	69.2	11.1	77.0	80.3	63	43	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		75.6	-	71.2	-0.9	85.8	87.8	40	39	25	No Change
Hispanic/Latino		69.6	71.7	78.4	6.7	82.3	84.8	75	145	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.3	80.9	89.5	8.6	93.8	94.7	59	43	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		83.3	87.7	89.1	1.4	90.3	91.7	66	236	75	On Target
High needs		81.1	85.3	87.7	2.4	89.0	90.6	92	179	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		85.6	85.6	87.8	2.2	86.8	92.8	92	168	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		70.0	87.9	88.7	0.8	82.5	85.0	88	42	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		70.4	67.9	80.2	12.3	82.7	85.2	89	43	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		85.1	-	82.7	-0.2	91.3	92.6	85	39	25	No Change
Hispanic/Latino		78.1	86.7	88.6	1.9	87.2	89.1	94	145	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		91.5	87.8	94.6	6.8	95.0	95.8	89	42	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.6	81.5	83.8	2.3	84.6	86.8	60	85	75	On Target
High needs		71.0	78.1	82.3	4.2	83.1	85.5	91	62	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.8	77.8	82.2	4.4	79.7	88.9	95	59	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		67.1	77.6	81.0	3.4	80.8	83.6	97	58	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	6.2	7.6	237	25	13.3	10.5	237	25
High needs	3.6	5.6	180	25	16.1	13.9	180	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.9	5.3	169	25	16.2	14.2	169	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	9.5	42	25	21.2	11.9	42	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	4.7	43	25	38.2	16.3	43	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	8.6	7.7	39	0	22.9	17.9	39	25
Hispanic/Latino	4.8	5.5	145	25	17.1	10.3	145	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	8.5	16.3	43	25	8.5	2.3	43	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	27.3	33.5	236	25	6.2	5.9	236	0
High needs	21.8	26.8	179	25	8.2	6.7	179	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	23.1	26.8	168	25	7.7	7.1	168	0
EL and Former EL	22.9	28.6	42	25	2.9	4.8	42	0
Students w/ disabilities	5.7	14.0	43	25	28.6	11.6	43	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	20.0	20.5	39	0	8.6	12.8	39	0
Hispanic/Latino	21.6	29.7	145	25	6.8	6.2	145	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	44.7	54.8	42	25	6.4	0.0	42	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	18.2	15.3	85	0	9.1	5.9	85	25
High needs	10.7	12.9	62	25	10.7	8.1	62	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	11.3	13.6	59	25	11.3	8.5	59	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	10.2	8.6	58	0	10.2	6.9	58	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		41.5	50.0	8.5	51.0	No	136	50	Below Target
High needs		41.5	50.0	8.5	51.0	No	104	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		39.0	50.0	11.0	51.0	No	99	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		43.5	47.5	4.0	51.0	Yes	88	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		41.0	56.0	15.0	51.0	Yes	25	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		61.0	56.0	-5.0	51.0	Yes	135	75	On Target
High needs		61.5	59.0	-2.5	51.0	Yes	103	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.0	57.5	-3.5	51.0	Yes	98	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		61.0	56.0	-5.0	51.0	Yes	88	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		63.5	61.0	-2.5	51.0	Yes	24	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	60.5	60.0	46.00	25
High needs	60.5	60.0	46.00	25
EL and Former EL	60.5	60.0	46.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	256	253	99	Yes	256	251	98	Yes	89	89	100	Yes
High needs	199	196	98	Yes	199	194	97	Yes	66	66	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	188	185	98	Yes	188	183	97	Yes	63	63	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	49	47	96	Yes	49	47	96	Yes	18	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	45	45	100	Yes	45	45	100	Yes	17	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	41	41	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes	7	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	160	158	99	Yes	160	157	98	Yes	61	61	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	45	44	98	Yes	45	43	96	Yes	19	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.