Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Brightwood

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Brightwood

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Brightwood (02810025)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.9	59.2	60.7	1.5	71.4	75.5	2	138	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		50.3	58.8	60.9	2.1	71.0	75.2	5	133	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		59.1	59.1	61.2	2.1	62.5	79.6	5	132	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		39.9	53.6	62.3	8.7	64.9	70.0	23	51	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		28.0	-	-	-	-	64.0	-	26	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		51.1	58.9	59.8	0.9	71.5	75.6	10	117	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.4	61.1	65.0	3.9	69.9	74.2	4	140	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		47.9	60.5	64.8	4.3	69.6	74.0	12	135	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.9	60.9	65.1	4.2	64.2	80.5	12	134	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		41.2	57.1	67.6	10.5	65.7	70.6	30	51	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		37.1	-	-	-	-	68.6	-	29	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		48.2	61.1	65.0	3.9	69.8	74.1	21	118	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		41.7	64.4	46.2	-18.2	66.0	70.9	3	33	0	Declined
High needs		42.0	62.5	46.2	-16.3	66.2	71.0	7	33	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		63.3	63.3	46.9	-16.4	66.4	81.7	11	32	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		42.0	64.1	45.4	-18.7	66.2	71.0	16	27	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.5	1.4	138	0	35.0	31.2	138	25
High needs	2.7	1.5	133	0	35.3	30.8	133	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.7	1.5	132	0	34.9	30.3	132	25
EL and Former EL	3.6	0.0	51	0	42.9	33.3	51	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.2	1.7	117	0	35.0	29.9	117	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.0	12.1	140	25	27.5	31.4	140	0
High needs	10.0	12.6	135	25	28.7	31.9	135	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.1	12.7	134	25	28.2	31.3	134	0
EL and Former EL	8.9	13.7	51	25	30.4	25.5	51	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	9.5	11.0	118	25	27.0	31.4	118	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.3	0.0	33	0	25.9	48.5	33	0
High needs	8.3	0.0	33	0	29.2	48.5	33	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	8.5	0.0	32	0	27.7	46.9	32	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	6.3	0.0	27	0	25.0	51.9	27	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.0	35.0	-8.0	51.0	No	74	25	Below Target
High needs		43.5	35.0	-8.5	51.0	No	73	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		44.0	36.5	-7.5	51.0	No	72	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		48.0	35.0	-13.0	51.0	Yes	30	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		43.0	38.0	-5.0	51.0	No	62	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		52.0	44.0	-8.0	51.0	Yes	76	75	On Target
High needs		49.0	45.0	-4.0	51.0	Yes	75	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		49.0	45.5	-3.5	51.0	Yes	74	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		59.0	52.5	-6.5	51.0	Yes	30	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		51.0	42.0	-9.0	51.0	Yes	63	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	71.5	60.0	72.00	25
High needs	71.5	60.0	72.00	25
EL and Former EL	71.5	60.0	72.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	170	166	98	Yes	169	165	98	Yes	40	40	100	Yes
High needs	162	158	98	Yes	161	157	98	Yes	40	40	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	160	157	98	Yes	159	156	98	Yes	39	39	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	66	66	100	Yes	66	65	98	Yes	17	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	36	32	89	No	36	34	94	No	9	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	25	-	-	-	25	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	142	139	98	Yes	141	138	98	Yes	32	32	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.