Massachusetts School and District Profiles

South Hadley High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - South Hadley High
Organization Information
District:South Hadley (02780000)School type:High School
School:South Hadley High (02780505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.6, Target = 97.4CPI = 97.6, Target = 97.4 95.5 97.5 97.6 0.1 97.4 97.8 43133100Above Target
High needsCPI = 92.4, Target = 94.2CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.2CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.2 90.0 92.9 92.4 -0.5 94.2 95.0 313625No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------25--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 97.9, Target = 97.6CPI = 97.9, Target = 97.6 95.9 98.1 97.9 -0.2 97.6 98.0 30117100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.3, Target = 95.5CPI = 94.3, Target = 95.5CPI = 94.3, Target = 95.5 92.2 91.7 94.3 2.6 95.5 96.1 6213275On Target
High needsCPI = 88.6, Target = 90.6CPI = 88.6, Target = 90.6CPI = 88.6, Target = 90.6 83.8 79.3 88.6 9.3 90.6 91.9 773550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------23--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 97.2, Target = 95.9CPI = 97.2, Target = 95.9CPI = 97.2, Target = 95.9 92.9 93.4 97.2 3.8 95.9 96.5 75115100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.4, Target = 94.2CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.2CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.2 90.1 91.6 92.4 0.8 94.2 95.1 5212150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 84.4, Target = 89.2CPI = 84.4, Target = 89.2CPI = 84.4, Target = 89.2 81.4 84.0 84.4 0.4 89.2 90.7 533250Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------23--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 93.9, Target = 94.5CPI = 93.9, Target = 94.5 90.6 92.7 93.9 1.2 94.5 95.3 5010775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 50.4 45.11330 1.5 0.813325
High needs 30.8 25.0360 5.1 2.83625
Econ. Disadvantaged--25---25-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 50.9 47.01170 1.9 0.911725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 52.2 60.613225 5.9 3.013225
High needs 26.8 37.13525 17.1 8.63525
Econ. Disadvantaged--23---23-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 57.3 64.311525 6.4 0.011525
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.4 24.01210 0.8 0.81210
High needs 15.4 3.1320 2.6 3.1320
Econ. Disadvantaged--23---23-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 25.5 24.31070 0.0 0.91070
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 52.0 53.0 1.0 51.0No12375On Target
High needsSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 48.0 42.5 -5.5 51.0No3050Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 53.5 53.0 -0.5 51.0No11075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 53.0 59.0 6.0 51.0Yes12275On Target
High needsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 52.5 66.0 13.5 51.0Yes29100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 57.0 58.0 1.0 51.0Yes10875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 93.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.2, Target = 80 91.3 93.2 1.9 80.0 90.014675On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 86.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.7, Target = 80 81.5 86.7 5.2 80.0 90.06075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.02--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.023--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Asian --- 80.0 90.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.07--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.09--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 96, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96, Target = 80 92.2 96.0 3.8 80.0 90.0125100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 92.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.5, Target = 85 91.2 92.5 1.3 85.0 95.016175On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 83.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.1, Target = 85 82.1 83.1 1.0 85.0 95.06525No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.026--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.03--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.09--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.06--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 93.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.6, Target = 85 92.4 93.6 1.2 85.0 95.014175On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1.1, Target = 1.6 2.8 1.7 1.1 0.6 1.6 1.44855875On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 2.1, Target = 3.4 5.9 4.2 2.1 2.1 3.4 3.04814375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------100--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------61--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------15--
Hispanic/Latino -------45--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.9, Target = 1.4 2.4 1.6 0.9 0.7 1.4 1.24446975On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students13713599Yes13613499Yes137137100Yes
High needs383695Yes373595Yes3838100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged262596Yes25---26---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities18---18---18---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black7---7---7---
Hispanic/Latino8---8---8---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White12011999Yes11911798Yes120120100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles