Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mosier
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Mosier
Organization Information
District:South Hadley (02780000)School type:Elementary School
School:Mosier (02780020)Grades served:02,03,04
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.5, Target = 92CPI = 79.5, Target = 92CPI = 79.5, Target = 92 86.3 74.6 79.5 4.9 92.0 93.2 2627150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 66, Target = 85.5CPI = 66, Target = 85.5CPI = 66, Target = 85.5 75.2 60.6 66.0 5.4 85.5 87.6 1311150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.5, Target = 66.9CPI = 67.5, Target = 66.9 63.9 63.9 67.5 3.6 66.9 82.0 158075On Target
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 50.6, Target = 78.6CPI = 50.6, Target = 78.6CPI = 50.6, Target = 78.6 63.3 40.1 50.6 10.5 78.6 81.7 154050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 69.9, Target = 84.6CPI = 69.9, Target = 84.6CPI = 69.9, Target = 84.6 79.5 58.6 69.9 11.3 84.6 89.8 373450Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.8, Target = 92.3CPI = 80.8, Target = 92.3CPI = 80.8, Target = 92.3 86.8 76.8 80.8 4.0 92.3 93.4 1622450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.3, Target = 92CPI = 84.3, Target = 92CPI = 84.3, Target = 92 86.2 84.4 84.3 -0.1 92.0 93.1 4526925No Change
High needsCPI = 74.8, Target = 85.4CPI = 74.8, Target = 85.4CPI = 74.8, Target = 85.4 75.0 71.2 74.8 3.6 85.4 87.5 4511150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.6, Target = 77.1CPI = 76.6, Target = 77.1 75.0 75.0 76.6 1.6 77.1 87.5 508075On Target
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60, Target = 81.2CPI = 60, Target = 81.2CPI = 60, Target = 81.2 67.8 49.3 60.0 10.7 81.2 83.9 364050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 80.1, Target = 83CPI = 80.1, Target = 83CPI = 80.1, Target = 83 77.3 72.0 80.1 8.1 83.0 88.7 743450Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.4, Target = 92.5CPI = 85.4, Target = 92.5CPI = 85.4, Target = 92.5 87.2 86.3 85.4 -0.9 92.5 93.6 3622225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.6 5.927125 11.1 11.82710
High needs 0.9 4.511125 23.9 23.41110
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.3 6.38025 17.7 22.5800
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0400 55.3 40.04025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 11.83425 21.9 23.5340
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.9 4.52240 10.4 10.32240
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.8 32.026925 6.0 8.62690
High needs 12.4 20.711125 15.0 16.21110
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.9 23.88025 11.4 16.3800
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities 2.6 7.54025 39.5 30.04025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino 12.1 20.63425 12.1 14.7340
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.7 33.322225 5.4 7.72220
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 34.0 63.0 29.0 51.0Yes129100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 21.0 56.5 35.5 51.0Yes50100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 25.0 53.0 28.0 51.0Yes37100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 44.0 60.0 16.0 51.0Yes107100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 38.0 54.0 16.0 51.0Yes129100Above Target
High needsSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 26.0 49.5 23.5 51.0Yes50100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 27.5 54.0 26.5 51.0Yes37100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 42.0 51.5 9.5 51.0No10675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.017-
High needs- 60.017-
EL and Former EL- 60.017-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students27827398Yes27827499Yes----
High needs11411197Yes114114100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged828098Yes8282100Yes----
EL and Former EL18---18-------
Students w/ disabilities4242100Yes4242100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5-------
Afr. Amer./Black2---2-------
Hispanic/Latino353396Yes3535100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White22922799Yes22922598Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles