Massachusetts School and District Profiles

P Brent Trottier
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - P Brent Trottier
Organization Information
District:Southborough (02760000)School type:Middle School
School:P Brent Trottier (02760305)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.2, Target = 98.1CPI = 97.2, Target = 98.1 96.7 97.3 97.2 -0.1 98.1 98.4 94476100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87.4, Target = 93.3CPI = 87.4, Target = 93.3CPI = 87.4, Target = 93.3 88.5 89.2 87.4 -1.8 93.3 94.3 888725No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL  93.2---- 96.6-25--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 81.6, Target = 91.4CPI = 81.6, Target = 91.4CPI = 81.6, Target = 91.4 85.2 84.7 81.6 -3.1 91.4 92.6 84570Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 98.7, Target = 98CPI = 98.7, Target = 98 96.6 99.1 98.7 -0.4 98.0 98.3 8259100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 97, Target = 98CPI = 97, Target = 98 96.6 97.1 97.0 -0.1 98.0 98.3 90372100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.8, Target = 91.3CPI = 91.8, Target = 91.3 85.1 90.4 91.8 1.4 91.3 92.6 94476100Above Target
High needsCPI = 74.1, Target = 79.2CPI = 74.1, Target = 79.2CPI = 74.1, Target = 79.2 64.4 70.9 74.1 3.2 79.2 82.2 898750Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL  88.6---- 94.3-25--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.9, Target = 73.1CPI = 64.9, Target = 73.1CPI = 64.9, Target = 73.1 53.8 62.9 64.9 2.0 73.1 76.9 885750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 97.5, Target = 97CPI = 97.5, Target = 97 94.8 98.2 97.5 -0.7 97.0 97.4 7959100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 91.3, Target = 90.9CPI = 91.3, Target = 90.9 84.4 89.5 91.3 1.8 90.9 92.2 87372100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.8, Target = 88.2CPI = 86.8, Target = 88.2CPI = 86.8, Target = 88.2 79.8 86.1 86.8 0.7 88.2 89.9 90161100Above Target
High needsCPI = 60.8, Target = 76.1CPI = 60.8, Target = 76.1CPI = 60.8, Target = 76.1 59.1 69.2 60.8 -8.4 76.1 79.6 50300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities  53.8---- 76.9-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------17--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 85.6, Target = 88CPI = 85.6, Target = 88CPI = 85.6, Target = 88 79.4 85.4 85.6 0.2 88.0 89.7 8312775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 30.4 29.04760 0.8 0.84760
High needs 9.1 8.0870 4.5 4.6870
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--25---25-
Students w/ disabilities 5.1 1.8570 6.8 7.0570
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 55.4 50.8590 0.0 0.05925
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--24---24-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--18---18-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 27.2 25.83720 1.0 0.837225
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 44.2 50.847625 4.3 4.24760
High needs 12.1 16.18725 17.6 19.5870
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--25---25-
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 8.85725 25.8 28.1570
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 76.8 83.1590 0.0 1.7590
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--24---24-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--18---18-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 40.1 46.837225 4.8 4.037225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.6 12.416125 4.0 5.01610
High needs 0.0 3.33025 13.3 26.7300
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--17---17-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 3.4 11.012725 4.1 5.51270
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 57.0 53.0 -4.0 51.0No45675On Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 58.0 55.0 -3.0 51.0No7575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-17--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-22--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 59.0 41.5 -17.5 51.0No4850Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 65.0 54.0 -11.0 51.0No5575On Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 55.0 53.0 -2.0 51.0No35975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 58.0 58.0 0.0 51.0Yes45775On Target
High needsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 52.0 61.0 9.0 51.0Yes75100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-17--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-22--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 50.0 57.0 7.0 51.0No4875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 67.0 64.0 -3.0 51.0Yes56100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 57.0 58.0 1.0 51.0Yes35875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.019-
High needs- 60.019-
EL and Former EL- 60.019-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students482481100Yes482481100Yes16616499Yes
High needs919099Yes919099Yes3131100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged22---22---9---
EL and Former EL2727100Yes2727100Yes6---
Students w/ disabilities595898Yes595898Yes2222100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian6161100Yes6161100Yes18---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---2---
Hispanic/Latino24---24---9---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.18---18---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White375374100Yes375374100Yes13012999Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles