Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Margaret A Neary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Margaret A Neary
Organization Information
District:Southborough (02760000)School type:Elementary School
School:Margaret A Neary (02760020)Grades served:04,05
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94, Target = 94.2CPI = 94, Target = 94.2 90.1 95.4 94.0 -1.4 94.2 95.1 8929475On Target
High needsCPI = 84.3, Target = 82.6CPI = 84.3, Target = 82.6CPI = 84.3, Target = 82.6 70.2 90.0 84.3 -5.7 82.6 85.1 8578100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL  86.4---- 93.2-32--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 80.4, Target = 80.9CPI = 80.4, Target = 80.9 67.2 85.0 80.4 -4.6 80.9 83.6 894275On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 95.2, Target = 96.4CPI = 95.2, Target = 96.4CPI = 95.2, Target = 96.4 93.8 98.2 95.2 -3.0 96.4 96.9 6152100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.9, Target = 93.8CPI = 93.9, Target = 93.8 89.3 95.0 93.9 -1.1 93.8 94.7 8421775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.2, Target = 93CPI = 94.2, Target = 93CPI = 94.2, Target = 93 88.0 94.2 94.2 0.0 93.0 94.0 90294100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87.5, Target = 81.9CPI = 87.5, Target = 81.9CPI = 87.5, Target = 81.9 69.0 85.4 87.5 2.1 81.9 84.5 9278100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL  85.2---- 92.6-32--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 80.4, Target = 79.1CPI = 80.4, Target = 79.1CPI = 80.4, Target = 79.1 64.1 79.3 80.4 1.1 79.1 82.1 8942100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 96.2, Target = 96.7CPI = 96.2, Target = 96.7 94.3 96.4 96.2 -0.2 96.7 97.2 5052100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.4, Target = 92.5CPI = 94.4, Target = 92.5CPI = 94.4, Target = 92.5 87.1 93.8 94.4 0.6 92.5 93.6 88217100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.2, Target = 93.1CPI = 92.2, Target = 93.1 88.2 90.5 92.2 1.7 93.1 94.1 91135100Above Target
High needsCPI = 81.3, Target = 85.4CPI = 81.3, Target = 85.4CPI = 81.3, Target = 85.4 75.0 77.4 81.3 3.9 85.4 87.5 903275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  91.7---- 95.9-22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.2, Target = 92.8CPI = 93.2, Target = 92.8 87.7 89.0 93.2 4.2 92.8 93.9 90107100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 33.7 23.52940 0.7 1.72940
High needs 13.3 11.5780 3.3 5.1780
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--32---32-
Students w/ disabilities 5.7 4.8420 5.7 9.5420
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 40.5 30.8520 0.0 1.9520
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.4 22.62170 0.9 1.82170
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 46.5 45.92940 1.0 0.729425
High needs 25.0 25.6780 5.0 1.37825
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--32---32-
Students w/ disabilities 14.3 14.3420 8.6 2.44225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 59.5 61.5520 0.0 1.9520
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 43.1 43.32170 0.9 0.521725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.7 31.913525 1.2 0.713525
High needs 3.2 12.53225 6.5 3.13225
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.6 31.810725 0.8 0.010725
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 57.0 54.5 -2.5 51.0No27675On Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 47.5 51.0 3.5 51.0No6975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-31--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 44.0 56.0 12.0 51.0No3575On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 68.5 60.0 -8.5 51.0No47100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 55.0 52.0 -3.0 51.0No20675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 46.0 49.0 3.0 51.0No27850Below Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 40.5 51.0 10.5 51.0No6975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-31--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 41.0 51.0 10.0 51.0No3575On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 57.0 52.0 -5.0 51.0No4875On Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 46.0 48.0 2.0 51.0No20750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 90.0 60.02125
High needs 90.0 60.02125
EL and Former EL 90.0 60.021-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students296295100Yes296295100Yes13713699Yes
High needs7878100Yes7878100Yes3232100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged14---14---6---
EL and Former EL3232100Yes3232100Yes11---
Students w/ disabilities4242100Yes4242100Yes18---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5252100Yes5252100Yes2222100Yes
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino14---14---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White218217100Yes218217100Yes10810799Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles