Massachusetts School and District Profiles

William E Norris
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - William E Norris
Organization Information
District:Southampton (02750000)School type:Elementary School
School:William E Norris (02750005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.5, Target = 93.1CPI = 86.5, Target = 93.1CPI = 86.5, Target = 93.1 88.2 86.8 86.5 -0.3 93.1 94.1 5428125No Change
High needsCPI = 68.8, Target = 84CPI = 68.8, Target = 84CPI = 68.8, Target = 84 72.6 71.7 68.8 -2.9 84.0 86.3 20920Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.4, Target = 87.1CPI = 77.4, Target = 87.1CPI = 77.4, Target = 87.1 85.9 85.9 77.4 -8.5 87.1 93.0 52420Declined
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60.1, Target = 78.9CPI = 60.1, Target = 78.9CPI = 60.1, Target = 78.9 63.9 60.7 60.1 -0.6 78.9 82.0 376225No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 87, Target = 93.2CPI = 87, Target = 93.2CPI = 87, Target = 93.2 88.3 86.0 87.0 1.0 93.2 94.2 4325250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.8, Target = 89.8CPI = 82.8, Target = 89.8CPI = 82.8, Target = 89.8 82.5 81.7 82.8 1.1 89.8 91.3 3728250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.8, Target = 80.3CPI = 62.8, Target = 80.3CPI = 62.8, Target = 80.3 66.2 64.1 62.8 -1.3 80.3 83.1 99225No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70.8, Target = 80CPI = 70.8, Target = 80CPI = 70.8, Target = 80 78.2 78.2 70.8 -7.4 80.0 89.1 28420Declined
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 54.8, Target = 75.8CPI = 54.8, Target = 75.8CPI = 54.8, Target = 75.8 58.5 50.9 54.8 3.9 75.8 79.3 226250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 82.6, Target = 89.8CPI = 82.6, Target = 89.8CPI = 82.6, Target = 89.8 82.5 81.0 82.6 1.6 89.8 91.3 2225350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 86.7CPI = 91, Target = 86.7CPI = 91, Target = 86.7 77.2 89.9 91.0 1.1 86.7 88.6 8761100Above Target
High needs  69.0---- 84.5-25--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.7, Target = 86.9CPI = 90.7, Target = 86.9CPI = 90.7, Target = 86.9 77.6 90.4 90.7 0.3 86.9 88.8 7959100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.4 14.92810 4.5 6.02810
High needs 2.0 5.49225 13.3 16.3920
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.3 9.54225 4.3 9.5420
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 1.66225 17.9 21.0620
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 16.0 15.12520 4.9 6.02520
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.1 24.528225 7.6 9.22820
High needs 8.1 10.99225 21.2 25.0920
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.9 14.3420 6.4 19.0420
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 1.8 8.16225 33.9 32.3620
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 19.2 23.725325 7.9 8.72530
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.2 19.7610 1.3 0.06125
High needs--25---25-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.7 18.65925 1.5 0.05925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 48.0 40.0 -8.0 51.0No19925Below Target
High needsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 48.0 38.0 -10.0 51.0No6125Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 41.0 30.0 -11.0 51.0No380Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 48.0 40.0 -8.0 51.0No18425Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 42.0 46.5 4.5 51.0Yes20275On Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 35.0 37.0 2.0 51.0No6150Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 26.0 36.0 10.0 51.0Yes3875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 42.0 46.0 4.0 51.0Yes18775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.07-
High needs- 60.07-
EL and Former EL- 60.07-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students29928196Yes29928395Yes676296Yes
High needs999295Yes999397Yes292690No
Econ. Disadvantaged484191No484294No16---
EL and Former EL8---8---1---
Students w/ disabilities636298Yes636298Yes14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---1---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---1---
Hispanic/Latino14---14-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White26825296Yes26825397Yes645996Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles