Massachusetts School and District Profiles

North Elementary
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - North Elementary
Organization Information
District:Somerset (02730000)School type:Elementary School
School:North Elementary (02730008)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.2, Target = 91 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 90.2, Target = 9175 or Higher All Students 84.5 88.0 90.2 2.2 91.0 92.3 7127275On Target
High needsCPI = 78.6, Target = 80.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 78.6, Target = 80.5 75 or Higher High needs 66.5 79.6 78.6 -1.0 80.5 83.3 646225No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85, Target = 83.6 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 85, Target = 83.6CPI = 85, Target = 83.675 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 82.1 82.1 85.0 2.9 83.6 91.1 8745100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.3, Target = 91 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 90.3, Target = 9175 or Higher White 84.5 88.4 90.3 1.9 91.0 92.3 6324875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83, Target = 88.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83, Target = 88.7 75 or Higher All Students 80.7 82.2 83.0 0.8 88.7 90.4 3927250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 65.7, Target = 75.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 65.7, Target = 75.6 75 or Higher High needs 58.1 64.4 65.7 1.3 75.6 79.1 146250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.7, Target = 69.5 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 71.7, Target = 69.5CPI = 71.7, Target = 69.575 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 66.7 66.7 71.7 5.0 69.5 83.4 3145100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.5, Target = 88.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 83.5, Target = 88.7 75 or Higher White 80.6 83.1 83.5 0.4 88.7 90.3 2724850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.3, Target = 91.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 77.3, Target = 91.1 75 or Higher All Students 84.7 83.2 77.3 -5.9 91.1 92.4 39960Declined
High needs  62.5---- 81.3-21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.1, Target = 91.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 78.1, Target = 91.2 75 or Higher White 84.9 83.3 78.1 -5.2 91.2 92.5 24880Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.2 16.527225 3.7 2.927225
High needs 1.9 1.6620 9.3 9.7620
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.6 2.2450 7.7 6.74525
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.6 16.124825 3.5 2.824825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 22.8 27.927225 9.6 11.42720
High needs 11.1 6.5620 29.6 25.86225
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.3 8.9450 25.6 17.84525
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.6 29.424825 9.1 10.52480
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.8 9.4960 6.8 6.3960
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.5 9.1880 6.0 6.8880
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 70, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 47.5 70.0 22.5 51.0Yes182100Above Target
High needsSGP = 63, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 44.0 63.0 19.0 51.0No39100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-28--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 70, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 5175 or Higher White 46.0 70.0 24.0 51.0Yes169100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 51, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 47.0 51.0 4.0 51.0Yes18275On Target
High needsSGP = 41, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 41, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 26.0 41.0 15.0 51.0No39100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-28--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 51, Target = 5175 or Higher White 48.0 51.0 3.0 51.0Yes16975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students282281100Yes282281100Yes9999100Yes
High needs6565100Yes6565100Yes2222100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4848100Yes4848100Yes17---
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities23---23---7---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White256255100Yes256255100Yes9090100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles