Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Oak Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Oak Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Shrewsbury (02710000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Oak Middle School (02710030)

Grades served:

07,08

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.8	94.6	94.1	-0.5	98.1	98.4	73	1003	25	No Change
High needs		91.2	80.6	81.4	0.8	94.9	95.6	56	235	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		85.9	85.9	86.8	0.9	87.1	93.0	70	100	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		87.8	73.5	74.0	0.5	92.9	93.9	64	150	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		98.5	96.3	96.8	0.5	99.1	99.3	59	238	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		92.0	90.3	88.1	-2.2	95.3	96.0	77	65	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		95.0	-	-	-	-	97.5	-	30	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.9	94.7	94.1	-0.6	98.2	98.5	64	643	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.3	85.6	87.5	1.9	93.8	94.7	80	1006	75	On Target
High needs		73.8	63.3	69.1	5.8	84.7	86.9	75	238	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.6	70.6	73.8	3.2	73.1	85.3	73	100	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		64.8	53.1	59.6	6.5	79.5	82.4	79	153	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		97.8	93.8	95.7	1.9	98.7	98.9	63	238	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		76.1	78.0	76.2	-1.8	86.1	88.1	82	65	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		96.3	-	-	-	-	98.2	-	30	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.1	84.3	86.4	2.1	93.6	94.6	71	646	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.0	85.0	83.5	-1.5	91.3	92.5	80	538	75	On Target
High needs		72.5	66.7	63.7	-3.0	84.0	86.3	64	128	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.1	77.1	68.5	-8.6	79.0	88.6	74	54	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		65.5	60.5	57.4	-3.1	79.9	82.8	70	88	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		92.1	89.0	92.5	3.5	95.4	96.1	65	113	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		79.8	69.8	72.3	2.5	88.2	89.9	94	37	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		84.3	85.6	82.3	-3.3	90.8	92.2	70	361	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	27.5	29.6	1003	0	3.0	3.2	1003	0
High needs	6.4	9.8	235	25	12.3	12.3	235	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.4	17.0	100	25	11.5	7.0	100	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.3	4.0	150	25	17.8	19.3	150	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Asian	44.3	47.9	238	0	3.0	2.1	238	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Hispanic/Latino	15.3	15.4	65	0	6.8	6.2	65	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	30	-	-	-	30	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	23.8	24.9	643	0	2.4	3.1	643	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	34.3	40.0	1006	25	9.6	8.2	1006	25
High needs	14.3	14.7	238	0	31.2	25.6	238	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	22.7	18.0	100	0	24.7	22.0	100	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Students w/ disabilities	7.9	9.2	153	25	42.1	36.6	153	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Asian	62.4	71.0	238	25	4.0	2.9	238	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Hispanic/Latino	15.5	20.0	65	25	15.5	18.5	65	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	30	-	-	-	30	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	28.0	31.7	646	25	10.1	8.4	646	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.9	12.1	538	25	4.9	6.1	538	0
High needs	1.7	4.7	128	25	16.9	22.7	128	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.2	5.6	54	25	8.3	18.5	54	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	3.4	88	25	21.7	28.4	88	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	17.6	27.4	113	25	7.7	2.7	113	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.4	10.8	37	25	10.3	16.2	37	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	6.9	7.8	361	25	3.3	5.5	361	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		41.5	40.0	-1.5	51.0	No	958	25	Below Target
High needs		33.0	34.0	1.0	51.0	No	215	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		35.5	36.0	0.5	51.0	No	95	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		28.0	29.0	1.0	51.0	No	135	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Asian		57.5	55.0	-2.5	51.0	Yes	224	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		40.0	37.0	-3.0	51.0	No	59	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	28	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		38.0	34.0	-4.0	51.0	No	622	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		34.0	45.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	962	75	On Target
High needs		33.0	43.0	10.0	51.0	Yes	222	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		32.0	40.5	8.5	51.0	No	94	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		32.0	43.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	140	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Asian		47.5	57.0	9.5	51.0	Yes	228	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		34.0	39.0	5.0	51.0	No	59	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	28	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		30.0	40.0	10.0	51.0	Yes	623	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	9.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	9.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	9.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	1036	1025	99	Yes	1037	1031	99	Yes	549	548	100	Yes
High needs	258	249	97	Yes	259	255	98	Yes	135	135	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	106	104	98	Yes	107	107	100	Yes	56	56	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	37	-	-	-	38	-	-	-	19	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	158	151	96	Yes	158	154	97	Yes	88	88	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Asian	243	242	100	Yes	243	243	100	Yes	115	115	100	Yes
Afr. Amer./Black	24	-	-	-	24	-	-	-	12	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	73	72	99	Yes	73	72	99	Yes	41	41	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	34	34	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	658	649	99	Yes	660	655	99	Yes	365	364	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.