Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Heights Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Heights Elementary

Organization Information
District:Sharon (02660000)School type:Elementary School
School:Heights Elementary (02660015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.4, Target = 97.4CPI = 95.4, Target = 97.4CPI = 95.4, Target = 97.4 95.5 95.1 95.4 0.3 97.4 97.8 96255100Above Target
High needsCPI = 90.2, Target = 93.7CPI = 90.2, Target = 93.7CPI = 90.2, Target = 93.7 89.2 92.1 90.2 -1.9 93.7 94.6 977475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------24--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 85.1, Target = 93.3CPI = 85.1, Target = 93.3CPI = 85.1, Target = 93.3 88.5 91.0 85.1 -5.9 93.3 94.3 954275On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 97.3, Target = 99.2CPI = 97.3, Target = 99.2CPI = 97.3, Target = 99.2 98.7 95.9 97.3 1.4 99.2 99.4 8683100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.7, Target = 97.4CPI = 95.7, Target = 97.4CPI = 95.7, Target = 97.4 95.5 95.1 95.7 0.6 97.4 97.8 94139100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97, Target = 95.5CPI = 97, Target = 95.5CPI = 97, Target = 95.5 92.3 96.8 97.0 0.2 95.5 96.2 98255100Above Target
High needsCPI = 93.6, Target = 88.7CPI = 93.6, Target = 88.7CPI = 93.6, Target = 88.7 80.6 92.9 93.6 0.7 88.7 90.3 9974100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------24--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 90.5, Target = 85.7CPI = 90.5, Target = 85.7CPI = 90.5, Target = 85.7 75.5 88.5 90.5 2.0 85.7 87.8 9842100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 99.1, Target = 99.4CPI = 99.1, Target = 99.4 99.0 99.7 99.1 -0.6 99.4 99.5 9083100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.8, Target = 95.8CPI = 96.8, Target = 95.8 92.8 95.9 96.8 0.9 95.8 96.4 97139100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.9, Target = 95.2CPI = 93.9, Target = 95.2CPI = 93.9, Target = 95.2 91.8 93.3 93.9 0.6 95.2 95.9 9578100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.3, Target = 88.5CPI = 86.3, Target = 88.5CPI = 86.3, Target = 88.5 80.2 84.6 86.3 1.7 88.5 90.1 972075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 96.4, Target = 97.6CPI = 96.4, Target = 97.6CPI = 96.4, Target = 97.6 95.8 96.2 96.4 0.2 97.6 97.9 7328100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.8, Target = 95.7CPI = 92.8, Target = 95.7CPI = 92.8, Target = 95.7 92.6 92.5 92.8 0.3 95.7 96.3 8838100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 26.4 28.22550 0.0 0.42550
High needs 7.9 18.97425 0.0 1.4740
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--24---24-
Students w/ disabilities 5.1 11.94225 0.0 2.4420
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 38.8 37.3830 0.0 1.2830
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--18---18-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.1 25.913925 0.0 0.013925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 57.3 63.925525 0.0 0.42550
High needs 30.2 44.67425 0.0 0.07425
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--24---24-
Students w/ disabilities 12.8 23.84225 0.0 0.04225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 80.7 81.9830 0.0 0.08325
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--18---18-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 47.4 58.313925 0.0 0.71390
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 37.0 41.07825 0.0 1.3780
High needs 19.2 20.0200 0.0 5.0200
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 39.4 53.62825 0.0 0.02825
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 36.8 34.2380 0.0 2.6380
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 58.0 62.0 4.0 51.0No166100Above Target
High needsSGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 51 49.0 62.5 13.5 51.0No42100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-13--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51 73.0 64.5 -8.5 51.0Yes50100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 52.5 62.0 9.5 51.0No96100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 75.0 63.0 -12.0 51.0No167100Above Target
High needsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 71.0 63.0 -8.0 51.0No43100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-13--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 82.5 60.0 -22.5 51.0No51100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 70.0 70.0 0.0 51.0No96100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.014-
High needs- 60.014-
EL and Former EL- 60.014-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students263263100Yes263263100Yes8080100Yes
High needs7878100Yes7878100Yes2121100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged22---22---10---
EL and Former EL26---26---7---
Students w/ disabilities4242100Yes4242100Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian8585100Yes8585100Yes2828100Yes
Afr. Amer./Black7---7---2---
Hispanic/Latino9---9---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.18---18---8---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White143143100Yes143143100Yes4040100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles