Massachusetts School and District Profiles

East Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - East Elementary

Organization Information
District:Sharon (02660000)School type:Elementary School
School:East Elementary (02660010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.8, Target = 98.2CPI = 94.8, Target = 98.2CPI = 94.8, Target = 98.2 96.9 95.0 94.8 -0.2 98.2 98.5 93212100Above Target
High needsCPI = 85.4, Target = 96.6CPI = 85.4, Target = 96.6CPI = 85.4, Target = 96.6 94.2 85.5 85.4 -0.1 96.6 97.1 885325No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.2, Target = 95.9CPI = 78.2, Target = 95.9CPI = 78.2, Target = 95.9 92.9 75.9 78.2 2.3 95.9 96.5 853150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 96.1, Target = 99.4CPI = 96.1, Target = 99.4CPI = 96.1, Target = 99.4 99.0 97.8 96.1 -1.7 99.4 99.5 6951100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 95.2, Target = 98CPI = 95.2, Target = 98CPI = 95.2, Target = 98 96.6 94.6 95.2 0.6 98.0 98.3 92136100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.8, Target = 96.7CPI = 95.8, Target = 96.7 94.3 97.2 95.8 -1.4 96.7 97.2 96212100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.8, Target = 95.6CPI = 86.8, Target = 95.6CPI = 86.8, Target = 95.6 92.5 93.0 86.8 -6.2 95.6 96.3 915375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.4, Target = 92.7CPI = 77.4, Target = 92.7CPI = 77.4, Target = 92.7 87.5 86.6 77.4 -9.2 92.7 93.8 82310Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 99, Target = 100CPI = 99, Target = 100 100.0 99.6 99.0 -0.6 100.0 100.0 8751100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 94.9, Target = 96.4CPI = 94.9, Target = 96.4CPI = 94.9, Target = 96.4 93.9 96.9 94.9 -2.0 96.4 97.0 90136100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.2, Target = 96.6CPI = 94.2, Target = 96.6CPI = 94.2, Target = 96.6 94.1 93.9 94.2 0.3 96.6 97.1 9573100Above Target
High needs -------14--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------14--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 95.7, Target = 96.1CPI = 95.7, Target = 96.1 93.3 93.0 95.7 2.7 96.1 96.7 9546100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 36.9 27.82120 0.8 1.42120
High needs 17.5 11.3530 3.5 3.8530
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 6.53125 7.1 6.5310
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 64.9 41.2510 0.0 0.05125
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 27.8 22.81360 1.3 1.51360
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 65.8 68.42120 0.8 1.92120
High needs 35.1 39.65325 3.5 7.5530
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities 10.7 22.63125 7.1 12.9310
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 82.5 86.3510 0.0 0.05125
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 61.3 62.51360 1.3 2.21360
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 40.8 46.67325 2.9 1.47325
High needs--14---14-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--14---14-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 39.4 39.1460 4.2 0.04625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 55.0 49.0 -6.0 51.0No14150Below Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 48.5 44.0 -4.5 51.0No3550Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 76.5 53.0 -23.5 51.0No3575On Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 49.0 47.0 -2.0 51.0Yes8775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 80.0 53.0 -27.0 51.0No14175On Target
High needsSGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51 73.0 39.5 -33.5 51.0No3425Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 86.0 61.0 -25.0 51.0No35100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 79.0 47.0 -32.0 51.0No8850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.016-
High needs- 60.016-
EL and Former EL- 60.016-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students217217100Yes217217100Yes7575100Yes
High needs5454100Yes5454100Yes14---
Econ. Disadvantaged17---17---6---
EL and Former EL19---19---1---
Students w/ disabilities3131100Yes3131100Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5353100Yes5353100Yes16---
Afr. Amer./Black8---8---2---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---8---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White137137100Yes137137100Yes4646100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles