Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mildred Aitken School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Mildred Aitken School
Organization Information
District:Seekonk (02650000)School type:Elementary School
School:Mildred Aitken School (02650015)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.6, Target = 95.9CPI = 92.6, Target = 95.9CPI = 92.6, Target = 95.9 93.0 87.4 92.6 5.2 95.9 96.5 8221275On Target
High needsCPI = 82, Target = 90.6CPI = 82, Target = 90.6CPI = 82, Target = 90.6 83.8 70.6 82.0 11.4 90.6 91.9 786450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 89.7, Target = 79.9CPI = 89.7, Target = 79.9CPI = 89.7, Target = 79.9 78.1 78.1 89.7 11.6 79.9 89.1 9634100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.8, Target = 83.2CPI = 68.8, Target = 83.2CPI = 68.8, Target = 83.2 71.2 58.0 68.8 10.8 83.2 85.6 623250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92, Target = 96.2CPI = 92, Target = 96.2CPI = 92, Target = 96.2 93.5 87.0 92.0 5.0 96.2 96.8 7219050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95, Target = 92.5CPI = 95, Target = 92.5CPI = 95, Target = 92.5 87.2 87.8 95.0 7.2 92.5 93.6 93212100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.3, Target = 86.6CPI = 86.3, Target = 86.6 77.0 71.9 86.3 14.4 86.6 88.5 896475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 94.1, Target = 84.2CPI = 94.1, Target = 84.2CPI = 94.1, Target = 84.2 82.8 82.8 94.1 11.3 84.2 91.4 9934100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.8, Target = 80.8CPI = 75.8, Target = 80.8CPI = 75.8, Target = 80.8 67.0 57.1 75.8 18.7 80.8 83.5 793250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.5, Target = 92.8CPI = 94.5, Target = 92.8CPI = 94.5, Target = 92.8 87.6 87.5 94.5 7.0 92.8 93.8 89190100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89, Target = 90.3CPI = 89, Target = 90.3CPI = 89, Target = 90.3 83.4 77.6 89.0 11.4 90.3 91.7 808275On Target
High needs  64.1---- 82.1-26--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.9, Target = 90.4CPI = 88.9, Target = 90.4CPI = 88.9, Target = 90.4 83.6 77.1 88.9 11.8 90.4 91.8 707450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.0 14.221225 4.2 1.421225
High needs 3.5 3.1640 14.0 4.76425
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.3 5.9340 12.5 2.93425
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0320 21.4 9.43225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.1 15.319025 4.6 1.619025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.9 46.721225 6.0 2.421225
High needs 14.0 18.86425 17.5 7.86425
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.8 32.43425 9.4 2.93425
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 10.7 6.3320 32.1 15.63225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.4 46.819025 6.6 2.619025
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.4 13.48225 5.2 2.48225
High needs--26---26-
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.1 13.57425 5.6 2.77425
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 38.0 56.5 18.5 51.0Yes134100Above Target
High needsSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 41.0 57.5 16.5 51.0Yes40100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 34.0 57.0 23.0 51.0Yes119100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 47.0 61.0 14.0 51.0Yes134100Above Target
High needsSGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51 39.0 59.5 20.5 51.0Yes40100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 46.0 58.0 12.0 51.0Yes11975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students215214100Yes215214100Yes8282100Yes
High needs6666100Yes6666100Yes2626100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3636100Yes3636100Yes18---
EL and Former EL7---7---2---
Students w/ disabilities3333100Yes3333100Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---2---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---2---
Hispanic/Latino10---10---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White19319299Yes19319299Yes7474100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles