Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Wampatuck Elementary

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Wampatuck Elementary

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.2, Target = 96.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 94.2, Target = 96.3 75 or Higher All Students 93.6 93.4 94.2 0.8 96.3 96.8 90202100Above Target
High needsCPI = 81.9, Target = 88.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 81.9, Target = 88.5 75 or Higher High needs 80.2 82.6 81.9 -0.7 88.5 90.1 785125No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.6, Target = 90.3 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 86.6, Target = 90.3 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 89.4 89.4 86.6 -2.8 90.3 94.7 902875On Target
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities  78.1---- 89.1-27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.2, Target = 96.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 95.2, Target = 96.6 75 or Higher White 94.2 94.5 95.2 0.7 96.6 97.1 92191100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.4, Target = 95.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 93.4, Target = 95.1 75 or Higher All Students 91.6 92.4 93.4 1.0 95.1 95.8 8620275On Target
High needsCPI = 77.9, Target = 81.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 77.9, Target = 81.5 75 or Higher High needs 68.2 75.0 77.9 2.9 81.5 84.1 585150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.8, Target = 85.1 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 84.8, Target = 85.175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 83.7 83.7 84.8 1.1 85.1 91.9 842875On Target
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities  61.7---- 80.9-27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.1, Target = 95.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 94.1, Target = 95.7 75 or Higher White 92.6 93.1 94.1 1.0 95.7 96.3 86191100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.6, Target = 95.4 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 94.6, Target = 95.475 or Higher All Students 92.1 94.3 94.6 0.3 95.4 96.1 9642100Above Target
High needs -------7--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------4--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95, Target = 95.2 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 95, Target = 95.275 or Higher White 91.7 95.3 95.0 -0.3 95.2 95.9 9440100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 23.4 31.220225 2.4 3.02020
High needs 16.3 9.8510 9.3 11.8510
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.1 14.3280 3.8 10.7280
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--27---27-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.1 33.019125 2.1 2.11910
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 41.9 58.920225 3.4 5.02020
High needs 16.3 29.45125 16.3 19.6510
Econ. Disadvantaged 19.2 39.32825 7.7 14.3280
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--27---27-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 43.5 61.319125 3.1 4.21910
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 49.1 31.0420 1.8 0.04225
High needs--7---7-
Econ. Disadvantaged--4---4-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--3---3-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 50.9 30.0400 1.9 0.04025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 68, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 56.5 68.0 11.5 51.0Yes146100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 55.5 56.0 0.5 51.0Yes3675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 68, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 5175 or Higher White 56.0 68.0 12.0 51.0Yes139100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 53.5 66.0 12.5 51.0Yes145100Above Target
High needsSGP = 65, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 39.5 65.0 25.5 51.0Yes36100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 67.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 67.5, Target = 51SGP = 67.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 51.0 67.5 16.5 51.0Yes138100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.06.00-
High needs- 60.06.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.06.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students204204100Yes204204100Yes4242100Yes
High needs5252100Yes5252100Yes7---
Econ. Disadvantaged2929100Yes2929100Yes4---
EL and Former EL6---6-------
Students w/ disabilities2727100Yes2727100Yes3---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---1---
Hispanic/Latino3---3---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White193193100Yes193193100Yes4040100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles